Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18615 (CHH)

RAMKALLI PANCHAGAM v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

REVP/61/2026 · 2026-03-22

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:13591 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR REVP No. 61 of 2026 Ramkalli Panchagam Wd/o Late Umashankar Aged About 61 Years Partner, R/o Village Kohliamar, Post And Tehsil Gurur, District - Balod, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Chief Secretary, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, Chhattigarh. 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, Chhattisgarh. 3 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of School Education, Bti Ground, Shankar Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Director, Department Of School Education, Indravati Bhawan, Nava Raipur Atal Nagar, Chhattisgarh. 5 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Director, Sector -19, North Block, Vikas Bhawan, Ground Floor, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Khulesh Sahu, Advocate For State : Mr. Krishan Gopal Yadav, Dy. Government Advocate alongwith Mr. Shailesh Puriya, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 23.03.2026 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition for reviewing the order dated 24.11.2025 passed by this Court in WPS No. 9918 of 2025. BHUMIKA ANGARE Digitally signed by BHUMIKA ANGARE Date: 2026.03.23 17:01:01 +0530 2 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that inadvertently WPS No. 9918 of 2025 has been tagged with bunch of cases bearing WPS No. 11009 of 2025 which was decided by this Court on 24.11.2025. The facts of bunch of cases are not similar to the present facts of case, as such the present case was entirely different from the bunch of cases decided by this Court and thus he would pray for recalling of the order. 3. Considering the submission and also considering the fact that facts of the present case are altogether different and it has been wrongly tagged with the bunch of cases, therefore, the order dated 24.11.2025 is recalled and WPS No. 9918 of 2025 is restored to its original number. List this case before a Bench having roster to it. 4. Accordingly, the instant Review Petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Bhumika