Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18604 (JHR)

MD NAUSHAD v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./3488/2026 · 2026-06-30

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:19102 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3488 of 2026 ---- 1.Md. Naushad aged about 41 years son of Md. Nasir, Resident of Chudi Mohalla, Kuraishi Mohalla, PO and PS Giridih Town, Dist. Giridih 2.Md. Tipu, aged about 33 years, son of Md. Asraf, resident of Churi Mohalla, Kuraishi Mohalla, PO and PS Giridih Town, Dist. Giridih .... Petitioners -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioners :- Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Tarun Kumar, Advocate ---- 2/30.06.2026 Heard learned counsels for petitioners and for State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Tundi PS Case No.19 of 2026, for offence registered under section 292 of BNS, 2023 and section 12(1) of Jharkhand Bovine Animal (Prohibition of Slaughter) Act, 2005, pending in court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dhanbad. 3. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that false allegations are made against the petitioners and the petitioners have nothing to do with the alleged flesh and bone of the bovine animals. He next submits that one Md. Shamshad has executed an agreement for sale of said Tempo in the name of petitioner no.2. He submits in view of that anticipatory bail may kindly be granted. 4. Learned State counsel opposes the prayer and submits that allegations are there of carrying flesh and bones of bovine animals without any valid document and in view of that anticipatory bail 2026:JHHC:19102 2 may kindly be rejected. 5. In the Tempo of the petitioner no.2, the said flesh and bones of bovine animals were being carried, and in that view of the matter, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner no.2, and as such, prayer for anticipatory bail in respect of petitioner no.2 is, hereby, rejected. 6. So far as petitioner no.1 is concerned, only allegation is there that this petitioner has fled away and he has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph no.13 of the petition, and in view of that, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner no.1. 7. Accordingly, petitioner no.1, namely Md. Naushad, is hereby directed to surrender before learned court within three weeks from today, and in event of his surrender/arrest, petitioner no.1, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of like amount each, to satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dhanbad, in connection with Tundi PS Case No.19 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) 30.06.2026 SI/