CRWP-5645 IN THE (114) RANDEEP K STATE OF P CORAM: Present: MANISHA B 1. the Constituti directing the o of the petition on their repres 2. submitted tha 10.05.2026 be raising their g has not yet bee 5645-2026 (O&M) (1) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH CR Da EP KAUR AND ANR Versus
OF PUNJAB AND ORS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MA Ms. Ekta Thakur, Advocate for th Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior D ****
HA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been file stitution of India seeking issuance the official respondents No.1 to 3 to etitioners at the hands of respondents N representation dated 10.05.2026 (Anne At the very outset, learned coun d that the petitioners have recently 26 before the Commissioner of Police heir grievances as mentioned in the p yet been considered and no action has JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CRWP-5645-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 14.05.2026 ... Petitioners
...Respondents E MANISHA BATRA
for the petitioners nior DAG, Punjab en filed under Article 226/227 of suance of a writ of mandamus to 3 to protect the life and liberty dents No.4 to 9 and to take action (Annexure P-4). d counsel for the petitioners has cently filed a representation on Police, Ludhiana (Annexure P-4) the present petition but the same n has been taken thereon. He AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.14 13:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-5645 further submit appropriate di Police, Ludhi petitioners and 3. 4. notice on beha be done in due her during the 5. commenting a disposed of at aforesaid rep petitioners wit order in accord petitioners, the in order to pro
14.05.2026 Amit Sharma 5645-2026 (O&M) (2) submitted that at this stage, the petiti iate directions are issued to respond Ludhiana to decide the aforesaid r rs and take necessary action thereon. Notice of motion. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior n behalf of the respondents-State and s in due course. Let a complete set of th ng the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer mad ting anything on the merits of the c of at this stage with a direction to res d representation dated 10.05.2026 rs within a period of 15 days from to accordance with law. Needless to say, rs, the official respondents would pro to protect their life and liberty. Whether speaking/reasoned:
   petitioners would be satisfied if spondent No.2-Commissioner of said representation filed by the reon. enior DAG, Punjab, has advance e and submits that the needful will et of the paperbook be supplied to r made by the petitioners, without f the case, the present petition is to respondent No.2 to decide the .2026 (Annexure P-4) of the rom today, by passing a speaking to say, if any threat is found to the ld provide them adequate security (MANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE ned:- Yes/No

AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.14 13:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.