ANIMA TOPPO v. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER AND ANOTHER
WPA/99/2026 · 2026-03-11
Tirthankar Ghosh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18599 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18599 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA [ CIRCUIT BENCH AT PORT BLAIR ] *** WPA/99/2026
Anima Toppo
Vs.
The Superintending Engineer and Another
Mr. Sanat
… for the petitioner
Mr. S.C. Mishra
… for the respondents [through virtual mode] March 11, 2026 [SR] Item No.21 Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner being aggrieved by the fact that the application which was advanced dated 24th January, 2026, till date, has not been considered by the Electricity Department. Learned advocate appearing for the respondent-Electricity Authority, submits that the same would be considered within a reasonable period of time. Having regard to the nature of the prayer advanced, I direct that the representation dated 24th January, 2026 filed by the petitioner namely Anima Toppo be considered and disposed of within a period of four weeks from date of communication of this order. The concerned authority would pass a reasoned order and dispose of the application within the scheduled time without any further delay. Accordingly, WPA/99/2026 is disposed of. All parties shall act on the server copy of this judgment duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
( Tirthankar Ghosh, J. )