IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 989 of 2026 Date of decision: 06.08.2026 Baldev Raj ...Petitioner. Versus Sh. Ashish Kohli, Director of School Education ...Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Vaibhav Tanwar, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Diwakar Dev Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Romesh Verma, Judge (Oral): The present petition has been filed alleging non- compliance of the judgment passed by this Court in CWP No. 497 of 2026, titled Baldev Raj vs. State of Himachal Pradesh & others, decided on 07.01.2026. 2. Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record instructions dated 04.08.2026. From perusal of the same, it is evident that representation of the petitioner has been considered and allowed. 3. Faced with the situation, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition can be closed at this stage, with liberty to file an appropriate application for revival of the instant 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? -2- petition in case grievance of the petitioner still remains to be unaddressed. 4. In view of above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and the same is closed, however with liberty, as aforesaid. Notices are discharged. (Romesh Verma) Judge August 6, 2026. (Nisha)