Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1859 (BOM)

GAUTAM PURSHOTTAM BUDRANI v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

IA/5663/2026 · 2026-07-27

Shri M S Karnik, Shri S M Modak

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

31-IA-5663-2026-IN-WP-6056-2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.5663 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6056 OF 2026 Gautam P. Budhrani ...Applicant V/s. State of Maharashtra and Anr. ...Respondents ***** Mr.Aayush Kedia i/b. Mr.Deepam Upadhyay, Advocate for Applicant. Smt.R.M.Shinde, AGP, for Respondents–State. ***** CORAM : M.S.KARNIK & S.M.MODAK, JJ. DATE : 27th JULY 2026 P. C. :- 1. We have heard learned counsel for the Applicant. 2. We see no reason to recall the order dated 7th May 2026 passed by this Court as the only direction issued by us is to the Sub-Divisional Officer, Panvel to ensure compliance of the order dated 11th April 2023 of the Additional Commissioner, Konkan Division expeditiously. 3. Learned counsel for the Applicant now says that the Sub- Divisional Officer, Panvel has to bear in mind the decision in Writ Satish Sangar 1/2 SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR Digitally signed by SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR Date: 2026.07.27 18:16:45 +0530 31-IA-5663-2026-IN-WP-6056-2026.doc Petition No.4009 of 2018 while deciding whether to continue with the inquiry or not. Obviously, the directions issued by this Court are subject to any orders passed by this Court or any legal impediment that may arise. The Applicant may place the order passed in the aforesaid Writ Petition for the consideration of the Sub-Divisional Officer, Panvel. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Panvel has to proceed obviously after taking into consideration the effect of the order passed in Writ Petition No.4009 of 2018 and in accordance with the procedure and law laid down. 4. The Interim Application is disposed of. (S. M. MODAK, J.) (M. S. KARNIK, J.) Satish Sangar 2/2