Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18589 (AP)

SMT. K.LAXMI @ BAGIRATHI v. K. NARSIMHULU

CMA/970/2009 · 2026-01-27

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam, Ravi Nath Tilhari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 (RNT,J &MRK,J CMA. NO.970 OF 2009) APHC010118032009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3524] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 970/2009 Between: 1. SMT. K.LAXMI @ BAGIRATHI, W/O K.NARSIMHULU, D/O M.NEELAKANTA HOUSE HOLD R/O H.NO. M 1296, HBS COLONY, YEMMIGANUR -518 360. ...APPELLANT AND 1. K NARSIMHULU, S/o K.N.Basalingappa Service R/o Venkateshwara Nagar, II Cross, Ward No.17, Near MG Company, ...RESPONDENT Appeal Under Section_____againstordersset aside the order under appeal IA NO: 1 OF 2009(CMAMP 1742 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the order dated 16-4-2009 made in OP.NO.4/2007 passed by the learned Senior Civil Judge, Adoni, pending disposal of the above appeal IA NO: 4 OF 2009(CMAMP 33052 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Appellant: 2 (RNT,J &MRK,J CMA. NO.970 OF 2009) 1. C N MOORTY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following: 3 (RNT,J &MRK,J CMA. NO.970 OF 2009) JUDGMENT:-(per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) This appeal has been filed by the appellant/wife being aggrieved from the dismissal of her petition filed under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act,1955, seeking restitution of conjugal rights, vide judgment and decree dated 16.04.2009 passed in O.P.No.4 of 2007 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Adoni. 2. On 18.03.2023, both parties were absent before the Lok Adalat. Hence, the matter was not settled. 3. Today also, there is no representation for the appellant, even in the revised call. 4. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM,J Date : 28.01.2026. RPD. 4 (RNT,J &MRK,J CMA. NO.970 OF 2009) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM (DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION) CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 970 OF 2009 Date: 28.01.2026 RPD.