Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18588 (RAJ)

DR. BIHARI LAL MEENA S/O SHRI SURAJ MAL MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/14926/2019 · 2026-02-09

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:5850] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14926/2019 Dr. Bihari Lal Meena S/o Shri Suraj Mal Meena, Aged 48 years R/o Village Rajpura Post- Sundlack Tehsil And District Baran (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 2. Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 3. The Director, Medical Health And Family Welfare Department , Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14220/2019 Dr. Hariom Goyal S/o Shri Radheshyam Goyal, Aged About 44 Years, Address - Near Sukhadia Park Chhabra Distt. Baran. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 2. Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 3. The Director, Medical, Health And Family Welfare Department, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14447/2019 Dr Mukesh Kumar Nagar S/o- Shri Rang Lal Nagar, Aged About 41 Years, Address - Village And Post Fatehpur, Tehsil And Distt. Baran (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Government [2026:RJ-JP:5850] (2 of 6) [CW-14926/2019] Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 2. Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 3. The Director, Medical, Health And Family-Welfare Department, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14454/2019 Dr Purusottam Meena S/o- Shri Madan Lal Meena, Aged About 48 Years, Address - Village And Post Godiya Mehar Teh. Chhabra Dist Baran Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 2. Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 3. The Director, Medical, Health And Family-Welfare Department, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14603/2019 Dr. Jagdish Prasad Kushwah S/o Shri Bhagwan Lal Kushwah, Aged About 43 Years, Address - H.n. 257, Bajrang Nagar Police Line Kota (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 2. Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 3. The Director, Medical, Health And Family Welfare Department, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Rajasthan). ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14688/2019 [2026:RJ-JP:5850] (3 of 6) [CW-14926/2019] Dr. Mukut Bihari Malav S/o Shri Mool Chand Malav, Aged About 46 Years, Adress- Village And Post- Kadiyanohar, Tehsil- Chhabra Distt. Baran (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 2. Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 3. The Director, Medical, Health And Family-Welfare Department, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14849/2019 Dr. Sampat Raj Nagar S/o Shri Ramcharan Nagar, Aged About 44 Years, Address - Village And Post Dolam Tehsil Chhipabarod Distt- Baran (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 2. Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 3. The Director, Medical, Health And Family- Welfare Department, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14927/2019 Dr. Paras Kumar Jain S/o Shri Banshi Lal Jain, Aged 45 years, R/o Near Sabji Mand Bamori Road Anta Distt. Baran (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 2. Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) [2026:RJ-JP:5850] (4 of 6) [CW-14926/2019] 3. The Director, Medical Health And Family Welfare Department , Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14929/2019 Dr Om Prakash Malav S/o Shri Ram Swaroop Malav, Aged 43 years, R/o Village Bhandahera Post-Simlia Tehsil Digod Distt. Kota (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 2. Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 3. The Director, Medical Health And Family Welfare Department , Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14932/2019 Dr. Ramesh Chand Meena S/o Shri Ramkaran Meena, Aged About 47 Years, Address- Village And Post- Pipalda Tehsil- Bonli, Distt- Sawaimadhopur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 2. Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 3. The Director, Medical, Health And Family Welfare Department, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Rajasthan) ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15421/2019 Rohitash Jogi S/o Shri Malla Nath, R/o Ward No. 11, Kanungo Hanuman Mandir Ke Pass, Narayanpur, Alwar, Rajasthan-301024 ----Petitioner Versus [2026:RJ-JP:5850] (5 of 6) [CW-14926/2019] 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 2. Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 3. The Director, Medical, Health And Family Welfare Department, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dharmendra Jain Mr. Arvind Kumar Arora For Respondent(s) : Ms. Sweekriti Sharma for Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 09/02/2026 1. At the request of learned counsel for the parties, these writ petitions are considered for final disposal at this stage only. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners while placing reliance upon judgment in the case of Firoj Arif Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.18268/2016) and connected matter decided by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 21.03.2017 submits that the controversy raised herein is no more res integra as same is already decided by this Hon'ble Court. He further referred order dated 12.02.2014 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition Nos. 9583/2008, 9582/2008 and 9584/2008 decided by a Co- ordinate Bench at Principal Seat, Jodhpur and submits that the order as mentioned hereinabove is also approved by Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court at Principal Seat Jodhpur in State of Rajasthan Vs. Dr. Paritosh Ujjwal on 09.07.2025. [2026:RJ-JP:5850] (6 of 6) [CW-14926/2019] 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents submits that these writ petitions may be disposed of in light of ratio laid down by this Hon'ble Court but a liberty is granted to the Department that in case there is any factual difference about applicability of aforesaid ratio then Department will consider the same. 4. Having considered aforesaid, these writ petitions are disposed of in terms of judgments in case of Firoj Arif (supra) and Dr. Paritosh Ujjwal (supra) but, in case, there is any factual difference or exits any reason to deviate from the ratio, the respondents are at liberty to decide the same with a well-reasoned and speaking order under intimation to the petitioner. 5. With aforesaid, these writ petitions are disposed of with pending application(s), if any. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /76-86