RAMA SHARMA D/O SH. DURGA PRASAD SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/13721/2020 · 2026-01-28
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18585 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18585 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:3771] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13721/2020 Rama Sharma D/o Sh. Durga Prasad Sharma, Aged About 37 Years, R/o House No. 1, Kamla Colony, Shivaji Nagar, Ondela Road, Dholpur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Medical, Health And Family Welfare, Secretariat, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Directorate Of Medical And Health Services, Through Director, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur.
3. Rajasthan Nursing Council, Through Registrar, Rajasthan Nursing Council, B-39, Sardar Patel Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Himanshu Kala and Mr. Nrip Raj Bhati for Mr. Ajatshatru Mina For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sweekriti Sharma for Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC Mr. Bharat Saini Mr. Neeraj Batra, GC with Ms. Gunjan Chawla HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 28/01/2026
1. Application No.1/2024 stands disposed as withdrawn as reply of respondent No.3 is already on record.
2. The instant writ petition is preferred by the petitioner with following prayer:-
“I. To revise the final allotment list dated 05.10.2020 issued by the Directorate of Medical and Health Service, Rajasthan after including the name of petitioner and declaring her successful for
[2026:RJ-JP:3771] (2 of 3) [CW-13721/2020] appointment on the post of “Nurse Grade-II”. (Annexure No.P/1) II. To direct the Rajasthan Nursing Council and Directorate of Medical and Health Services to grant appointment to the petitioner on the post of “Nurse Grade-II” in the instant recruitment of 2018. III. To consider the petitioner successful on the post of “Nurse-Grade-II” with effect from 24.01.2020 and grant her all the consequential benefits accordingly. IV. To pass any other order or relief as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and necessary.”
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy raised herein is already considered by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur in case of Sangeet Mathews @ Sangeeta Choudhary Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1552/2020 and same was later followed by another Co-ordinate Bench in case of Ishwar Singh Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1063/2020 and bunch of petitions.
4.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submits that a liberty be granted to them to examine the veracity of facts as claimed by the petitioner.
5. Having considered aforesaid, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is disposed in light of ratio laid down in case of Sangeet Mathews @ Sangeeta Choudhary Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra) and the petitioner is directed to file a representation along with a copy of this order to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days who shall consider the case of the present petitioner in light of ratio laid down in case of Sangeet Mathews @ Sangeeta Choudhary Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra) and if the ratio is applicable upon
[2026:RJ-JP:3771] (3 of 3) [CW-13721/2020] the facts as claimed by the petitioner, then same benefit be extended to the petitioner but the respondents are at liberty to verify the veracity of the facts as claimed by the petitioner and if they found that the facts are different then they are under an obligation to pass a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 60 days from the date of submission of representation.
6. Needless to say that the petitioner be informed about the decision either by e-mail, if e-mail is provided by the petitioner in representation or by speed post.
7. Misc. application, if any, also stands disposed.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/38