Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18576 (RAJ)

BADRIPRASAD MEENA S/O SHRI RAMLAL MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/10824/2025 · 2026-01-16

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:1901] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10824/2025 1. Badriprasad Meena S/o Shri Ramlal Meena, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Seva Sadan, Near Kholi Chowk, Sangam Vihar, Deoli South Delhi. 2. Ramlal Meena S/o Shri Dungraram Meena, R/o 164, Gunavata, Bans Ki Dhani, Amer Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anirudh Singh Rathore Mr. Yuvraj Singh for Mr. Deepak Chauhan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, P.P. with Ms. Preeti Kumari, S.I., Police Station Amer, Jaipur HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 16/01/2026 1. The petitioners have filed this anticipatory bail application under Section 482 B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R. No.321/2022 registered with the Police Station, Amer, District Jaipur City (North) for offence under Sections 420, 467, 468 & 471 of I.P.C. 2. At the very outset, learned Public Prosecutor submits that the allegations levelled against the present accused- petitioners have not been found to be proved even after a thorough investigation. [2026:RJ-JP:1901] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-10824/2025] 3. In view of the fact that the allegations levelled against the present accused-petitioner have not been found to be proved in the investigation, the present anticipatory bail application is disposed of in view of the statement made by learned Public Prosecutor that the apprehension of the petitioner does not subsist. 4. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application stands disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /285