Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18576 (JHR)

MD. SAIF ALAM @ SAIR ALAM @ SERA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5921/2026 · 2026-06-30

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:19088] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5921 of 2026 Md. Saif Alam @ Saif Alam @ Sera, Aged about 26 years, Son of Manzoor Alam, Resident of Raza Colony, P.O. & P.S. Lower Bazar, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Tiwari, Adv. For the State : Mr. Santosh Kr. Shukla , Addl. PP 02 / 30.06.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Hindpiri P.S. Case No. 03 of 2026 in Sessions Trial Case No. 198 of 2026 instituted under Section 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was in illegal possession of pistol, magazine as well as the live cartridge which was recovered from the possession of the co-accused and the co-accused in his confessional statement has implicated the petitioner, to be the person who has been entrusted the same to the co- accused. It is also alleged that the petitioner is involved in illegal sale and purchase of the fire arms. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and chargesheet has been submitted against the petitioner. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 30.01.2026 , as mentioned in para 10 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case, hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Additional Commissioner-XVII, Ranchi in connection with Hindpiri P.S. Case No. 03 of 2026 in Sessions Trial Case No. 198 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Dated 30.06.2026 Smita/-