[2026:RJ-JP:675] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 5537/2025 Ashok Alias Teetu Son Of Vinod Sharma, Resident Of 1/523, Uit Bhiwadi Tehsil Tapukada District Khairthal Tijara. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The P.p. 2. Pawan Dutt Son Of Shri Ravi Dutt, Resident Of Rz 15, G Block, Dharmpura, Najafgarh, New Delhi. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jaswant Singh for Mr. Harendra Singh For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. Amit Punia, PP Mr. Sikandar Singh Sakkarwal HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 08/01/2026 1. Parties are present in person and have duly been identified by their respective counsel. 2. By way of this criminal misc. petition under Section 528 of the BNSS, the accused-petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer to quash the FIR No.205/2024 registered at Police Station Bhiwadi Phase-III, District Bhiwadi for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 189(2), 324(4), 324(5), 351(2) & 110 of BNS, 2023 along with criminal proceedings arising out of it. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is brother-in-law of the complainant and cross-cases have been registered between the parties. He submits that in cross-case negative final report has already been submitted. Now, [2026:RJ-JP:675] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-5537/2025] complainant has entered into a compromise with the petitioner and the complainant does not want to pursue the impugned FIR. The written compromise has been annexed with this petition. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant do not dispute the aforesaid factual position. 5. Considering the submissions made on behalf of the respective parties; the material made available for my perusal and the fact that the parties have resolved their dispute amicably and the present case is wholly covered by the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr-reported in 2012 Cr.L.J. (SC) 4934 and in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Choudhary Bhajan Lal & Ors. [AIR 1992 SC 604], the aforesaid FIR is liable to be quashed in view of compromise arrived at between the parties. 6. In view of the above, this criminal misc. petition is allowed and the FIR No.205/2024 registered at Police Station Bhiwadi Phase-III, District Bhiwadi along with criminal proceedings arising out of it are quashed and set aside. Consequence to follow. 7. Stay application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /131