Gurrala Parvathamma alias Revarthamra v. Gurrala Chinna Reddamma
CRLP/1577/2020 · 2026-03-08
Y Lakshmana Rao
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18564 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18564 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010114692020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1577/2020 Between:
1.GURRALA PARVATHAMMA ALIAS REVARTHAMRA, , W/O. LATE CHINNA KONDAIAH, AGED 6 YEARS. OCC CULTIVATION 2.GURRALA REDDENNA REDDAIAH,, S/O. LATE CHINNA KONDAIAH, AGED 46 YEARS, 0CC CULTIVATION 3.GURRALA LAKSHMI DEVI,, W/O. REDDANNA @ REDDAIAH, AGED 41 YEARS, 0CC CULTIVATION PETITIONERS 1 AND 2 ARE R/O. D NO. 9611-11-1, PATHA UTUKURU HARIJANAWADA, CK DINNE MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1.GURRALA CHINNA REDDAMMA, W/O.LATE CHINNAIAH, AGED 42 YEARS, R/O. PATHA UTUKURU HARIJANAWAD, CK DINNE, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT 2.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BLDFS, AMARAVATI. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
1.T JANARDHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)
2 2.SHAIK MOHAMMED ISMAIL The Court made the following:
ORDER: Despite the matter having been listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there has been no representation on behalf of the Petitioners. Even after affording sufficient opportunity, neither the Petitioners nor their Counsel have chosen to appear or prosecute the case. It is also pertinent to observe that the present case constitutes one of the oldest matters pending on the roster. The non- appearance of the Petitioner, despite the long pendency of the matter, reflects a lack of diligence. In view of the absence of representation and the failure to advance
arguments, this Court is of the opinion that the Petitioners are not interested in pursuing the present proceedings. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 09.03.2026 VTS