[ 2026:JHHC:19090] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5927 of 2026 Vinay Yadav, aged about 39 years, Son of Late Vishundeo Yadav, Resident of Village-Dabra, P.O. & P.S.-Lesliganj, District- Palamu. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioners : Mr. Pankaj Kr. Dubey, Adv. For the State : Mr. Shree Prakash Jha , Addl. PP 02 / 30.06.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Lesliganj P.S. Case No.40 of 2026 instituted under Section 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109(1), 3(5) of BNS, 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with his wife, attempted to murder Dilwar Yadav. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and the genesis of the occurrence is quarrel regarding digging out mango sapling planted by the informant. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 11 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 02.05.2026, as mentioned in para 1 of this bail application. It is next submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class Palamu at Daltonganj in connection with Lesliganj P.S. Case No.40 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Dated 30.06.2026 Smita/-