1 2026:CGHC:13901 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2355 of 2026 1 - Sagar Verma S/o Prem Verma Aged About 29 Years R/o House No. 213, College Road, Ward No. 6, Jashpur, District- Jashpur (C.G.) ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur, (C.G.) 2 - The Director Directorate Of Public Education Chhattisgarh, Indrawati Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, Distt.- Raipur, (C.G.) 3 - The Collector, Jashpur Distt.- Jashpur (C.G.) 4 - The President Of Swami Atmanand Govt. Excellent English Medium Schools Management Committee Jashpur, District- Jashpur, (C.G.) 5 - The District Education Officer Jashpur, District- Jashpur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Shalvin Sharma, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Ajay Kumrani, Panel Lawyer SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 24 /03/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 That this Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to the case of the petitioner. 2 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue appropriate writ/writs, order/orders and/or direction/directions to direct the respondent authority thereby setting-aside quashing the advertisement dated 30.06.2025 (Annexure P/1). 10.3 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue appropriate writ/writs, order/orders and/or direction/directions to direct the respondents that the advertisement may be modified to the extent of required qualifications for the post of Lecturer of General Studies (English Medium) 10.4 Any other relief order or direction which may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case including the cost of the petition.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after filing of the writ petition, petitioner has procured some important additional document under the Right to Information Act, 2005 and therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition at this stage with liberty to file better constituted petition. 3. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 4. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY