SURESH PAD MITRA @ SURESH PADA MITRA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./6007/2026 · 2026-07-01
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18560 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18560 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:19192 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 6007 of 2026
------ Suresh Pad Mitra @ Suresh Pada Mitra, aged about 52 years, s/o late Motilal Mitra, r/o Village-Stationpada, P.O.+P.S.- Rajgangpur, Dist.-Sundergarh (Odisha)
… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Mohit Prakash, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Santosh Kr. Shukla, Addl. P.P. ------
Order No.02 Dated- 01.07.2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Bolba P.S. Case No.11 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Section 310(2), 317(3) of the B.N.S., 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was taking away pipe from the site of the informant after chasing the informant and his associates and as the informant intimated the police, police arrived at the spot and apprehended the co-accused persons. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the alleged looted articles have not been taken away and the property which has been alleged to be taken away are not stolen property. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 10.05.2026 as is evident from para-01 of the instant bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-12 of the instant bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the co-accused person with similar allegation has already been admitted to bail by
this Court vide order dated 24.06.2026 in B.A. No.5746 of 2026. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Simdega in connection with Bolba P.S. Case No.11 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
01.07.2026 Gunjan-