Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18557 (JHR)

ABDUL SHEIKH ALIAS MD ABDUL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6064/2026 · 2026-07-01

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:19280] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6064 of 2026 Abdul Sheikh @ Md. Abdul aged about 26 Years S/O Md. Azu, Resident of Village: Godha Toli, Post Office & Police Station: Sadar, District: Ranchi (Jharkhand). … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. K.S.Nanda , Adv. For the State : Ms. Priya Shrestha, Spl. PP 02 / 01.07.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Lower Bazar P.S. Case No-145/2024(S) instituted under Section 414/34 of I.P.C. and under Section 21(b) of NDPS Act and under Sections 25(1- B)a, 26, 35 of Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in sale and purchase of brown sugar which is also known as Heroine and from the co-accused Rizwan Ansari, 7 gms. of brown sugar which comes under intermediate quantity and one six round revolver of 7.65 bore was recovered and on the basis of the disclosure of the co-accused -Rizwan Ansari that the petitioner succeeded in fleeing away from the place of occurrence, the petitioner has been implicated in this case. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 12 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 21/04/2026, as mentioned in para 1 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co- operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case, hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail. Learned Spl. P.P. opposed the prayer for bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Judicial Commissioner-XVII at Ranchi in connection with Lower Bazar P.S. Case No-145/2024(S) with the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Dated 01.07.2026 Smita/-