[2026:RJ-JP:912] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12972/2022 Jeetendra Singh Solanki S/o Tej Singh Solanki, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Village Mahu Khas, Post Mahuibrahimpur, Hindaun City, District Karauli - 322254. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Additional Chief Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Govt. Secretariat, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. The Director, Medical And Health, Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur (Raj.). 3. The Chief Medical And Health Officer, District Karauli, Rajasthan, Near New Jail, Mandrayal Road, Karauli, Rajasthan 322241. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikram Beniwal Mr. Maniratna Solanki Mr. Babu Lal Nasuna For Respondent(s) : Ms. Sweekriti Sharma for Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 09/01/2026 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioner with following prayer: “In these circumstances, it is, therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to accept this writ petition and i) the impugned order dated 26.08.2022 removing humble Petitioner from the post of Nurse Gr.II may kindly be declared illegal and arbitrary and therefore, same may kindly be quashed and set aside; [2026:RJ-JP:912] (2 of 3) [CW-12972/2022] ii) by issuing the writ of mandamus, order or direction in the nature thereof respondents may kindly be directed to treat humble petitioner as eligible under Outstanding Sportsman quota and to continue humble Petitioner on the post of Nurse Gr.II with all consequential benefits; and 2. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring and relying upon judgment dated 15.12.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 234/2025 titled as Sumitra Runla and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Anr. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by this Hon’ble Court. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioner and also material placed on record, the writ petition may be disposed in light of Sumitra Runla and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Anr. (supra). 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case of Sumitra Runla and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Anr. (supra), but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the [2026:RJ-JP:912] (3 of 3) [CW-12972/2022] petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. Needless to say that if ratio is applicable upon facts of the case as claimed by the petitioner, then same benefits be extended. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /49