APHC010114952014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3327] WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO.34116 OF 2014 Between: Mandapalli Narendra Babu and others ...PETITIONERS AND The Govt. of AP, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Social Welfare (SCP-I) Department and others. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioners: 1. NANDIGAM KRISHNA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: 1. B D MAHESWARA REDDY 2. GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE 3. GANDRALA RATHNA KUMAR SC For APSCCFC LTD 4. Sireesha Rani Vallabhaneni,Standing Counsel For Municipalities 5. . 6. B PRAKASAM ( SC FOR AP APSCCFC) The Court made the following ORDER: The present Writ Petition has been filed for the following relief. <…….To issue an appropriate order, Writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus i) to declare the proceedings issued by 4th respondent herein in Roc.No.810/ 09/E2, SRK, J W.P.No.34116 of 2014 2 dated 16.10.2014, deleting the names of the petitioners from the beneficiaries of Scheduled Caste Action Plan 2013-14, though their cases were recommended by respondents 2 and 3 herein and though the loans have been sanctioned by various banks under various proceedings, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust apart from violative of principles of natural justice and contrary to the very purpose and object of the scheme framed under GO Ms. No.101, Social Welfare (SCP-I) Department, dated 31.12.2013, issued by 1st respondent herein; and ii) to consequently set aside the proceedings Roc.No.810/09/E2, dated 16.10.2014, issued by the 4th respondent herein by directing the respondents herein to extend the benefits by releasing the loans to the petitioners as has been sanctioned by the respondents 2 and 3.= 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, Ms. Y. Bindu, learned counsel representing Sri Nandigam Krishna Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that nothing survives for adjudication in the Writ Petition and the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ________________________ K. SREENIVASA REDDY, J. Date:07.01.2026 Nsr SRK, J W.P.No.34116 of 2014 3 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. SREENIVASA REDDY Writ Petition No.34116 of 2014 Date:07.01.2026 Nsr