Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18544 (JHR)

MD. ARSLAN @ MD. ARSALAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6034/2026 · 2026-07-01

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:19255 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6034 of 2026 ------ Md. Arslan @ Md. Arsalan, aged about 19 years, S/o Md. Alamgir @ Md. Alamgeer, R/o -133, Tanjim Nagar, Near Adivasi Football Ground, Hindpiri, P.O.-G.P.O. & P.S.-Hindpiri, Dist.-Ranchi, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Pandey, Advocate : Ms. Arti Kumari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shiv Shankar Kumar, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 01-07-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Jagarnathpur P.S. Case No.56 of 2026, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 310(2) of B.N.S, 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed dacoity and looted money bags of the workers of M/s Dina Petro Villa which is a petrol pump. It is next submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the allegations are false. It is then submitted that though the petitioner is not named in the FIR without putting him on T.I.P. as mentioned in para- 10 of this bail application, charge sheet has been submitted against him. It is further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-11 of this bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 30.03.2026 as is evident from para-01 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned JMFC, Ranchi in connection with Jagarnathpur P.S. Case No.56 of 2026 with the condition that he will co- operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 01/07/2026 Abhiraj/