Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18541 (DEL)

STATE NCT OF DELHI v. RAJEEV @ RAJEEV ARORA

CRL.M.C./5224/2026 · 2026-09-17

Madhu Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~17 to 21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010331382026 + CRL.M.C. 5224/2026 STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP with Mr. Varun Kumar, Ms. Suman and Ms. Priyanka Tyagi, Advs. SI Sanjay Kumar. versus RAJEEV @ RAJEEV ARORA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Arav Pandit and Ms. Roohe Hina Dua, Advs. ~18 # CNR No. DLHC010331412026 + CRL.M.C. 5230/2026 STATE .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP with Mr. Varun Kumar, Ms. Suman and Ms. Priyanka Tyagi, Advs. SI Sanjay Kumar. versus FARIS ARORA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Arav Pandit and Ms. Roohe Hina Dua, Advs. ~19 # CNR No. DLHC010331402026 + CRL.M.C. 5232/2026 STATE .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP with Mr. Varun Kumar, Ms. Suman and Ms. Priyanka Tyagi, Advs. SI Sanjay Kumar. versus SHWETA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Arav Pandit and Ms. Roohe Hina Dua, Advs. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/09/2026 at 11:10:37 ~20 # CNR No. DLHC010333132026 + CRL.M.C. 5320/2026 STATE .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP with Mr. Varun Kumar, Ms. Suman and Ms. Priyanka Tyagi, Advs. SI Sanjay Kumar. versus PANKAJ KUMAR @ PANKAJ ARORA @ PANKAJ RANGEELA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Arav Pandit and Ms. Roohe Hina Dua, Advs. ~21 # CNR No. DLHC010337442026 + CRL.M.C. 5354/2026 STATE .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP with Mr. Varun Kumar, Ms. Suman and Ms. Priyanka Tyagi, Advs. SI Sanjay Kumar. versus RAMA ARORA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Arav Pandit and Ms. Roohe Hina Dua, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN O R D E R % 17.09.2026 1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode. 2. Learned APP for the State submits that during the pendency of the present petition, FIR No. 206/2026 registered at Police Station Laxmi Nagar, District East, Delhi, for offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 303(2), 351 read with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/09/2026 at 11:10:37 [hereinafter referred to as ‘BNS’] which forms the subject matter of the present proceedings, has been quashed by this Court vide order dated 25.08.2026 passed in CRL.M.C. 6319/2026, on the basis of Settlement Agreement dated 06.08.2026. That the parties had resolved their disputes arising out of the cross-cases and had agreed not to pursue the respective FIRs. Accordingly, FIR No. 206/2026 and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom were quashed. 3. In view of the aforesaid, learned APP for the State submits that nothing further survives for consideration in the present petition. 4. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of as infructuous. 5. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of. 6. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. MADHU JAIN, J SEPTEMBER 17, 2026/JYH/PG This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/09/2026 at 11:10:37