Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18536 (RAJ)

PURSHOTTAM SAINI SON OF SHRI KISHAN GOPAL MALI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/5732/2023 · 2026-02-13

Bhuwan Goyal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:6906] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 5732/2023 Purshottam Saini Son of Shri Kishan Gopal Mali, Aged About 35 Years, Resident of Plot No. 13-A, Adarsh Basti, Gali No. 4, Barkat Nagar, Tonk Phatak, Jaipur (Rajasthan). ----Complainant/Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Director General of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. Commissioner of Police, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. Deputy Commissioner of Police, Jaipur City (South), Jaipur. 5. SHO, Police Station, Muhana, Jaipur City (South), Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Abhilasha Sharma, Adv. Mr. Ramesh Chandra Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 13/02/2026 1 ;kph@ifjoknh dh vksj ls mDr ,dyihB vkijkf/kd fofo/k ;kfpdk varxZr /kkjk 482 lhvkjihlh ¼528 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk½ esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 364@2021] iqfyl Fkkuk& eqgkuk] ftyk& t;iqj 'kgj ¼nf{k.k½] vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 420] 406] 506] 120&ch Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk dh 'kh?kz] izHkkoh] fu"i{k tkap ofj"B iqfyl vf/kdkjh ls djokus dh izkFkZuk ds lkFk izLrqr dh xbZ gSA 2 fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph@ifjoknh dk dFku gS fd izdj.k esa vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh }kjk iqfyl Fkkuk&eqgkuk] t;iqj 'kgj ¼nf{k.k½ esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 364@2021 esa izHkkoh ,oa fu"i{k :i ls vuqla/kku ugha fd;k tk jgk gS] vr% izdj.k esa vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh [2026:RJ-JP:6906] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-5732/2023] dks funsZ'k fn;s tkos fd izdj.k esa ;Fkk'kh?kz izHkkoh ,oa fu"i{k vuqla/kku dh dk;Zokgh dj viuh fjiksVZ fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa ;Fkk'kh?kz izLrqr djsA 3 fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us ;kfpdk dk fojks/k djrs gq, dFku fd;k fd izLrqr ekeys esa vuqla/kku vf/kdkjh }kjk fu;ekuqlkj 'kh?kz izHkkoh ,oa fu"i{k :i ls vuqla/kku fd;k tk jgk gS ,oa lkFk gh dFku fd;k fd ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds U;kf;d n`"Vkar Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 2008 Supreme Court 907 ds vuqlkj vuqla/kku ds i;Zos{k.k djus dh vf/kdkfjrk eftLVªsV dks miyC/k gS fQj Hkh ;kph@ifjoknh dks ;fn dksbZ O;Fkk gS rks og lacaf/kr eftLVsªV U;k;ky; esa mifLFkr gksdj /kkjk 233 ch,u,l,l ds rgr ;Fkksfpr dk;Zokgh djus gsrq Lora= gSA 4 eSaus i=koyh dk lEekuiwoZd voyksdu fd;k rFkk mHk;i{k ds rdksZa ij xEHkhjrkiwoZd euu fd;kA 5 ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk Sakiri Vasu (Supra) ds ekeys esa izfrikfnr O;oLFkk ds vuqlkj eftLVsªV dks vuqla/kku dk i;Zos{k.k djus dh vf/kdkfjrk izkIr gS] ,slh fLFkfr esa ;fn ;kph@ifjoknh dks mDr vuqla/kku ds lanHkZ esa dksbZ O;Fkk gS rks og l{ke eftLVsªV U;k;ky; esa pkjktksgh djus gsrq Lora= gSA 6 ;kph@ifjoknh dh vksj ls ;fn dksbZ izkFkZuk i= fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa izLrqr fd;k tkrk gS] rks fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ls ;g vis{kk dh tkrh gS fd og mDr izkFkZuk i= dk fof/k vuqlkj 'kh?kzrk ls fuLrkj.k djssaxsA 7 vr% mijksDRk U;kf;d n`"Vkar esa izfrikfnr O;oLFkk dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, mDr ;kfpdk mijksDr vuqlkj fuLrkfjr dh tkrh gSA 8 izdj.k ls lacaf/kr ;fn dksbZ vU; izkFkZuk i= yafcr gksa] rks os Hkh fuLrkfjr fd, tkrs gSaA (BHUWAN GOYAL),J RAHUL KUMAR KHANDELWAL /3