[2026:RJ-JP:3775] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 760/2024 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14598/2023 Ravindra Kumar Sharma Son Of Shri Deep Chand Sharma, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Helak Gate Dhanwara Road, Kumher District Deeg. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Smt. Shubhra Singh, Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Dr. K.k. Sharma, Director, Medical, Health And Family Welfare Organization, Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur. 3. Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Chief Medical And Health Officer, Bharatpur. 4. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gordhan Singh Fauzdar, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Yash Joshi, Adv., Ms. Tanvisha Pant, Adv. & Mr. Priyam Agarwal, Adv. for Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 28/01/2026 1. This contempt petition has been filed by the petitioner for alleging non-compliance of order dated 18.09.2023 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14598/2023, wherein directions were given to the respondents to award appropriate bonus marks to petitioner on the basis of experience certificate possessed by him, treating as permissible for the candidates who have worked during [2026:RJ-JP:3775] (2 of 2) [CCP-760/2024] Covid-19 period provisionally and thereafter, they may also be considered for document verification. 2. After receiving notices, reply to the contempt petition has been filed by the respondents stating therein that in compliance of order dated 18.09.2023, three different certificates submitted by the petitioner were duly considered by the Competent Authority. As regards certificate No.337 dated 29.05.2023 is concerned, same was issued by the CMHO, Bharatpur, verifying the working of petitioner from 15.07.2021 to 31.03.2022. Such certificate was issued as per the guidelines, therefore, it was considered by the respondents and bonus marks qua that certificate have already been awarded to the petitioner. So far as remaining two certificates are concerned, they were not issued by the Competent Authority and in accordance with the guidelines, therefore, such certificates were not taken into account for the purpose of awarding bonus marks. 3. No rejoinder to such reply has been filed by the petitioner to controvert the contentions made by the respondents in their reply. 4. In view of above, no case of deliberate and willful non- compliance is made out, hence, the contempt petition is hereby dismissed and notices stand discharged. 5. However, mere dismissal of this contempt petition would not prejudice rights of the petitioner which are being agitated by him in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14598/2023. (ANAND SHARMA),J Jatin /12