Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18531 (RAJ)

RAMJI LAL VERMA S/O LATE SHRI GANGA RAM VERMA v. SHRI ASHUTOSH AGNIHOTRI

CCP/883/2025 · 2026-01-23

Anand Sharma

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:3193] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 883/2025 IN S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8181/2006 Ramji Lal Verma S/o Late Shri Ganga Ram Verma, Aged About 78 Years, Resident Of Plot No 3/64, Parasram Nagar, Daher Ka Balaji, Sikar Road, Jaipur (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. Shri Ashutosh Agnihotri, The Chairman Cum Managing Director, Food Corporation Of India, FCI House, 16-20, Barahkhamba Lane, Headquarters, New Delhi. 2. Shri Ashutosh Agnihotri, The Chairman And Managing Director, Food Corporation Of India FCI House, 16-20, Barahkhamba Lane, Headquarters, New Delhi. 3. Shri Divya Prakash Shukla, The Executive Director North East Zone, Food Corporation Of India, Zonal Office, G.S. Road, Ulubari, Guwahati-781007 Assam. 4. Shri Shorabh Chourasiya, The General Manager Region, Food Corporation Of India, Regional Office 4, Nehru Lal Kothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur Rajasthan. 5. Shri Pranay Mudghil, The Area Manager, Food Corporation Of India, District Office Chhawani Choraya, Kota Rajasthan Present Address Rawatbhata Road, Kota (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhishek Khandelwal with Mr. Kamal Kant Sharma For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 23/01/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that against the order dated 11.03.2025, the respondents have [2026:RJ-JP:3193] (2 of 2) [CCP-883/2025] preferred D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No. 1013/2025, in which after hearing learned counsel for the petitioner as well as respondents, order dated 11.03.2025 has been stayed. 2. In view of above, no cause of action as of today survives for pursuing the contempt petition. Hence, the contempt petition filed by the petitioner is, hereby, dismissed. 3. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to revive the contempt petition, in case, the D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) is decided in his favour and despite that, the respondents do not comply with the order dated 11.03.2025. (ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU/13