1 | P a g e IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C). No. 3156 of 2026 Md. Jamil Ansari `…. Petitioner Represented by Mr. K.A.Guru, Advocate -Versus - State of Odisha & Ors …. Opposite Parties Represented by Mr. S.S.Routray, ASC CORAM: JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA ORDER_ 06.04.2026 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. The sole grievance of the petitioner is that the application seeking mutation of the ROR is not being accepted by the Tahsildar, Sambalpur. This Court finds no reason for not accepting the application for mutation by the Tahasildar though he can deal with it in accordance with law thereafter. 3. The writ application is therefore, disposed of directing the Tahasildar, Sambalpur to accept the mutation application to be submitted by the petitioner. The Tahasildar shall first accept the application and proceed thereafter in accordance with law. This Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the claim for correction of ROR. (Sashikanta Mishra) Judge Deepak Order No. 03.