[2026:RJ-JP:4111-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 302/2025 Rajesh Son Of Shri Raghuveer, Aged About 36 Years, Resident Of Bhondwara, Tehsil Nadoti, Police Station Garhmohra, District Karauli (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Home Secretary, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Director General Of Police, Police Headquarter, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Additional Director General Of Police, Anti Human Trafficking, Unit Jaipur (Raj.) 4. Superintendent Of Police, Karauli, District Karauli (Raj.) 5. S.h.o. Of Police Station Garhmora, District Karauli (Raj.) Respondents 6. Roop Singh Son Of Vishram Gurjar, Resident Of Bhondwara, District Karauli (Raj.) 7. Vikki Son Of Latoor, Resident Of Garhmora, Tehsil Naodit, District Karauli (Raj.) ----Accused Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Babu Lal Bairwa For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA cum AAG with Mr. Aman Agarwal Ms. Neha Goyal Mr. Vinod Sharma Mr. Naresh Kumar Gupta, P.P. Mr. Shree Ram Dhaker, DGC Mr. Harendra Singh, C.I. & Ms. Madhuri Sharma, MFC (349), P.S. Garhmora, District Karauli HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI Judgment / Order 29/01/2026 [2026:RJ-JP:4111-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-302/2025] Pursuant to order of this Court dated 15.01.2026, the missing girl Ms. “J” is produced before us by Mr. Harendra Singh, C.I. and Ms. Madhuri Sharma, MFC (349), Police Station Garhmora, District Karauli. Indisputably, she is minor aged about 15-16 years. On interaction, she submitted that she is not in illegal detention and is residing at Jaipur on her own. She empathetically submitted that she does not wish to go to her parental home but, would like to stay at Balika Grah. In view thereof, this habeas corpus petition is disposed of in following terms:- (1) The Police authorities are directed to keep Ms. “J” in Balika Grah, Hindaun, District Karauli and the State Authorities are directed to ensure her well-being till she attains the age of majority. (2) The parents are at liberty to meet her as per applicable rules and regulations. (3) It is clarified that if Ms. “J” wants to reside with her parents in future, she is at liberty to move an appropriate application in this regard before the competent forum. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Manish/s-90