2026:HHC:34813 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Ex. Pt. No. 1644 of 2026 Decided on : 18.08.2026 Punam Chandel …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others …Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice G.S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bipin C. Negi, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Ms. Vandana Thakur, Advocate for Mr. Surinder Kumar Saklani, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Arsh Rattan, Deputy Advocate General. G.S. Sandhawalia, Chief Justice (Oral ) The petitioner has not approached the respondents for implementation of judgment dated 02.03.2013 and filed the execution petition straight away. 2. Faced with this situation, counsel for the petitioner submits that she may be permitted to withdraw the execution petition, with liberty to take steps effectively for filing a representation to the State and in case, the State takes no action on the said representation, then to approach the Court afresh, if 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:34813 permissible. 2. Accordingly, the present execution petition is disposed of, with liberty, as prayed for. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly. (G.S. Sandhawalia) Chief Justice (Bipin C. Negi) Judge August 18, 2026 (Shivank Thakur)