Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18522 (CHH)

GHANSHYAM PATEL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/1245/2026 · 2026-03-22

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:13602 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1245 of 2026 Ghanshyam Patel S/o Shri Bundram Patel Aged About 37 Years R/o Village Chhote Devgaon, Tahsil Kharsia, District Raigarh (CG) ... Petitioner. Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary, Department Of Revenue Disaster Management, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District- Raipur (CG) 2 - Collector District Raigarh (CG) 3 - Sub Divisional Officer (R) Kharsia, District Raigarh (CG) 4 - Nayab Tahsildar Kharsia, District Raigarh (CG) 5 - Anusuiya Gupta D/o Sant Ram Gupta Aged About 40 Years R/o Amadol, Tahsil Kahrsia, District Raigarh (CG) ... Respondents. (cause title downloaded from CIS Periphery) For Petitioner : Mr. Jeet Ram Patel, Advocate. For Res No.1 to 4/State : Mr. Anadi Sharma, PL. (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi ) Order on Board 23/03/2026 1. By of this Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner's limited prayer is to direct Respondent No.4 - Naib Tahsildar Digitally signed by AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI DN: cn=AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, ou=HIGH COURT, o=HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, st=Chhattisgarh, c=IN Date: 2026.03.24 12:47:55 +0530 2 Kharsia, District Raigarh to decide the pending Revenue Case No.202506040500191/A-68/24-25, in expeditious manner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the private respondent No.5 has encroached Government land, therefore, on being application filed by the petitioner, the aforesaid revenue case has been registered by the Naib Tahsildar Kharsia (Respondent No.4) against respondent No.5 which is pending consideration since 2022 and same has not been concluded till date. Hence, the respondent No.4 may be directed to decide the same expeditiously within stipulated time frame. 3. Learned State counsel submits the revenue case is under consideration and same will be decided expeditiously. 4. Having considered the limited grievance of the petitioner, without entering into merits of the case, this petition is disposed of directing respondent No.4- Naib Tahsildar Kharsia to decide the afore-mentioned revenue case expeditiously preferably within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of copy/submission of this order, in accordance with law. 5. With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Ajay