[2026:RJ-JP:3209] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12714/2021 Laxmi D/o Shri Udaypal, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Jurhara, Dist. Bharatpur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Rural Development And Panchatiraj Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. (Raj.) 2. The Secretary, Education Department, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner (Raj.) 4. Dy. Director, Elementary Education Department, Rajasthan, Bikaner (Raj.) 5. Chief District Education Officer, Bharatpur (Raj.) 6. District Education Officer, Elementary Education, Bharatpur (Raj.) 7. Chief Exective Officer, Zila Parishad, Bharatpur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Gopal Krishan Shrma, AGC with Mr. Saumil Sharma Mr. Ashutosh Udawat, AAAG for Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 23/01/2026 1. The instant writ petition is filed by the petitioner with following prayer:- “(i) by appropriate writ, order or direction, respondents may directed to make notional pay fixation of petitioner and give them seniority from the date of appointment has been given to other persons selected through same process in the larger interest o justice. (ii) Issue any other writ order or direction, which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper, may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner. [2026:RJ-JP:3209] (2 of 2) [CW-12714/2021] (iii) Cost of the writ petition be also awarded in favour of the petitioner.” 2. Application No.1/2026 filed for early listing stands disposed. 3. During course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy raised herein has already been considered by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in case of Hemlata Shrimali and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. Reported as 2015 (2) W.L.N. 347. Therefore, the writ petition be disposed of on basis of ratio laid down in case of Hemlata Shrimali and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra). 4. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection in disposal of the writ petition on basis of aforesaid ratio with liberty to the respondents to examine the veracity of the facts. 5. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition stands disposed of in light of the case of Hemlata Shrimali and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra). The respondents are at liberty to examine the veracity of the facts as claimed by the petitioner but in case the judgment as claimed by the petitioner is not applicable on the facts of the case, then they are under an obligation to decide the issue with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. Needless to say that they will supply a copy of such decision to the petitioner either by e-mail or by speed post. 7. With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed. 8. Misc. application, if any, also stands disposed. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/34