GULAFSHABANI MOHAMMED AFSHAR ANSARI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/5705/2026 · 2026-05-14
Manisha Batra
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18519 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18519 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-5705 IN THE (149 )
GULAFSHA
STATE OF P
CORAM: Present:
MANISHA B
1.
Constitution o the official res petitioners at t their represent
2.
submitted tha 09.05.2026 b (Annexure P petition but the 5705-2026 (O&M)
(1) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH
Da SHABANU MOHAMMED AFSHA
Versus OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MA
Ms. Kirti Hooda, Advocate for Mr. R.S. Pathania, Advocate for t Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior D **** HA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been fil tion of India seeking issuance of a w ial respondents No.2 and 3 to protec rs at the hands of respondents No.4 a resentation dated 09.05.2026 (Annexu At the very outset, learned coun d that the petitioners have recently 26 before the Senior Superintend re P-4) raising their grievances as but the same has not yet been consider
JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CRWP-5705-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 14.05.2026 FSHAR ANSARI AND ANR
... Petitioners
...Respondents E MANISHA BATRA te for the petitioner nior DAG, Punjab een filed under Article 226 of the of a writ of mandamus directing protect the life and liberty of the 4 and 5 and to take action on nnexure P-4). d counsel for the petitioners has cently filed a representation on rintendent of Police, Pathankot es as mentioned in the present nsidered and no action has been AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.14 18:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.
CRWP-5705
taken thereon would be satis Senior Superi representation
3.
4.
notice on beha be done in due her during the
5.
commenting a
disposed of at aforesaid rep petitioners wit
order in accord petitioners, the in order to pro 14.05.2026 Amit Sharma
5705-2026 (O&M)
(2) ereon. He further submitted that at e satisfied if appropriate directions are Superintendent of Police, Pathanko tation filed by the petitioners and take Notice of motion. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior n behalf of the respondents-State and s in due course. Let a complete set of th ng the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer mad ting anything on the merits of the c of at this stage with a direction to res d representation dated 09.05.2026 rs within a period of 15 days from to accordance with law. Needless to say, rs, the official respondents would pro to protect their life and liberty.
Whether speaking/reasoned:
hat at this stage, the petitioners ns are issued to respondent No.2- thankot to decide the aforesaid d take necessary action thereon. enior DAG, Punjab, has advance e and submits that the needful will et of the paperbook be supplied to r made by the petitioners, without f the case, the present petition is to respondent No.2 to decide the .2026 (Annexure P-4) of the rom today, by passing a speaking to say, if any threat is found to the ld provide them adequate security (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE ned:- Yes/No AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.14 18:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.