Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18519 (PNJ)

GULAFSHABANI MOHAMMED AFSHAR ANSARI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/5705/2026 · 2026-05-14

Manisha Batra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-5705 IN THE (149 ) GULAFSHA STATE OF P CORAM: Present: MANISHA B 1. Constitution o the official res petitioners at t their represent 2. submitted tha 09.05.2026 b (Annexure P petition but the 5705-2026 (O&M) (1) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH Da SHABANU MOHAMMED AFSHA Versus OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MA Ms. Kirti Hooda, Advocate for Mr. R.S. Pathania, Advocate for t Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior D ****  HA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been fil tion of India seeking issuance of a w ial respondents No.2 and 3 to protec rs at the hands of respondents No.4 a resentation dated 09.05.2026 (Annexu At the very outset, learned coun d that the petitioners have recently 26 before the Senior Superintend re P-4) raising their grievances as but the same has not yet been consider JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CRWP-5705-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 14.05.2026 FSHAR ANSARI AND ANR ... Petitioners ...Respondents E MANISHA BATRA  te for the petitioner nior DAG, Punjab een filed under Article 226 of the of a writ of mandamus directing protect the life and liberty of the 4 and 5 and to take action on nnexure P-4). d counsel for the petitioners has cently filed a representation on rintendent of Police, Pathankot es as mentioned in the present nsidered and no action has been AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.14 18:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-5705 taken thereon would be satis Senior Superi representation 3. 4. notice on beha be done in due her during the 5. commenting a disposed of at aforesaid rep petitioners wit order in accord petitioners, the in order to pro  14.05.2026 Amit Sharma 5705-2026 (O&M) (2) ereon. He further submitted that at e satisfied if appropriate directions are Superintendent of Police, Pathanko tation filed by the petitioners and take Notice of motion. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior n behalf of the respondents-State and s in due course. Let a complete set of th ng the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer mad ting anything on the merits of the c of at this stage with a direction to res d representation dated 09.05.2026 rs within a period of 15 days from to accordance with law. Needless to say, rs, the official respondents would pro to protect their life and liberty. Whether speaking/reasoned:    hat at this stage, the petitioners ns are issued to respondent No.2- thankot to decide the aforesaid d take necessary action thereon. enior DAG, Punjab, has advance e and submits that the needful will et of the paperbook be supplied to r made by the petitioners, without f the case, the present petition is to respondent No.2 to decide the .2026 (Annexure P-4) of the rom today, by passing a speaking to say, if any threat is found to the ld provide them adequate security (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE  ned:- Yes/No   AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.14 18:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.