Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1851 (UTT)

JAGMOHAN SINGH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSS/966/2026 · 2026-04-07

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:2432 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPSS/966/2026 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Vikram Singh Dhapola, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. K.N. Joshi, Deputy Advocate General for the State. Mr. Neeraj Garg, Advocate for the UPNL. 2. Petitioner was engaged through outsourcing as Lab attendant in a Government school in District Bageshwar. His engagement has been discontinued by the outsourcing agency (UPNL) based on a letter issued by Chief Education Officer, Bageshwar. The said letter is on record as Annexure-4 to the writ petition, wherein it is mentioned that petitioner is indifferent towards his duties and he is not extending any cooperation to the school authorities and also to the Science Teacher. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegations made in the letter are unfounded; petitioner is the sole bread earner and due to his disengagement, he is on the verge of starvation. 4. Learned State Counsel, however, submits that Chief Education Officer was justified in writing letter, as petitioner was not discharging the duties assigned to him. 5. Mr. Neeraj Garg, learned counsel 2026:UHC:2432 appearing for the UPNL submits that the disengagement is because of the letter issued by Chief Education Officer. 6. Since petitioner was not given any show cause notice before issuing letter to UPNL, therefore, the observations made against him in the letter are liable to be ignored. 7. Having regard to the facts of the case, the writ petition is disposed of by permitting the petitioner to make representation for his re- engagement in some other organisation/ department to the UPNL. If he makes such representation within two weeks, the competent authority in UPNL shall pass appropriate order on such representation, as per law, within four weeks thereafter. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 07.04.2026 Mahinder/ MAHINDER SINGH Digitally signed by MAHINDER SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=da6212e6e78d94ed3134842bc6a8d6ca168979ca7b8c2f031a92d1a18b08923c, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=AB77B7C5B240908B392BE84F5CDD4C2AF35DC4626D305B1BC9EA4BABA 43D2B8F, cn=MAHINDER SINGH Date: 2026.04.08 10:34:48 +05'30'