908-ARP-112-26.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 112 OF 2026 Kamalasha Infrastructure And Engineering ...Petitioner Versus Global Enterprises ...Respondent ---------- Mr. Vishal Tambat a/w Ms Rochelle Fernandes and Ms Sejal Mhaskar for Petitioner. Mr. Rohit Mishra for Respondent. ---------- CORAM: S. M. MODAK, J. DATED: 21st AUGUST, 2026 P.C. 1. Heard learned Advocate for the Petitioner and learned Advocate for the Respondent. 2. Learned Advocate for the Respondent has invited my attention to clause Q(b) of the Agreement at page 28 of the Petition. This agreement is executed between the parties. 3. Clause Q(a) provides for referring the dispute to the Managing Director of the Petitioner’s company. There is a consensus amongst both the parties that earlier it is not referred to the Managing Director. On the basis of the instructions, learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits that the Meera Jadhav MEERA MAHESH JADHAV Digitally signed by MEERA MAHESH JADHAV Date: 2026.08.24 13:54:13 +0530 908-ARP-112-26.DOC parties will contact the Managing Director of their company. Learned Advocate for the Respondent consented to the same. 4. In view of above, the Petitioner wants to withdraw the Petition. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. If, there is an occasion for appointment of an arbitrator, the Petitioner is at liberty to take appropriate steps. (S. M. MODAK, J.) Meera Jadhav