Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1850 (BOM)

MR. PAWAN KUMAR HARIPRASHAD SHUKLA AND ANOTHER v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI THR. ITS MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER AND ANOTHER

AO/762/2026 · 2026-08-06

Sharmila U Deshmukh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

27-AO-762-2026.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.762 OF 2026 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.5887 OF 2026 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO.762 OF 2026 Pawan Kumar Hariprashad Shukla And Another …Appellant/ Applicant Versus Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai Through its Municipal Commissioner And Another ...Respondents —————— Mr. Vivek Shukla a/w Mr. Rohan Manoj Surve, Mr. Ashok Shukla and Mr. Dilip Gupta for the Appellant/Applicant Ms. Neeta Jadhav i/b Ms. Komal Punjabi for the Respondents-MCGM —————— CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : AUGUST 6, 2026 P. C. : 1. Learned counsel for the Appellant, on instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the Appeal. 2. Appeal is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn. 3. It is expected that, in the event the eviction is carried out by the Corporation, appropriate guidelines and the statutory provisions would be complied with by the Corporation. SQ Pathan 1/2 SHAGUFTA QUTBUDDIN PATHAN Digitally signed by SHAGUFTA QUTBUDDIN PATHAN Date: 2026.08.07 10:03:38 +0530 27-AO-762-2026.doc 4. Interim Application does not survive for consideration and stands disposed of. [SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.] SQ Pathan 2/2