Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18499 (RAJ)

DINESH KUMAR SHARMA S/O SHRI RAGHUVAR DAYAL SHARMA v. STATE BANK OF INDIA

WRES/587/2025 · 2026-01-22

Ashok Kumar Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:2984] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Writ Restoration Application No. 587/2025 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6126/2022 1. Dinesh Kumar Sharma S/o Shri Raghuvar Dayal Sharma, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Arya Nagar, Alwar (Raj.) 2. Paras Chand Jain S/o Shri Kailash Chand Jain, R/o Alwar F.I. R.B.O., Alwar. 3. Usha Satwani D/o Thawardas Satwani W/o Inder Kumar, R/o Alwar. 4. Sitaram S/o Shri Kundan Lal, R/o B-25, Balnagar, Kartarpura, Jaipur. 5. Surendra Mohan Soni S/o Bhanwar Lal Soni, R/o 45, Balaji Vihar, Badarbas, Gopalpura Byepass, Jaipur. 6. Pawan Kumar Mehta S/o Shri Shanti Lal Mehta, R/o Sbi, Jhotwara, Jaipur. 7. Pankaj Gupta S/o Shri Ramniwas Gupta, R/o 102, Civil Lines, Kota. 8. Smt. Rajeshpuri W/o Shri Ashokpuri, R/o Plot No. 3, Gopal Vihar, Bara Road, Kota. 9. Shyam Bihari Kachot S/o Shri Chauthmal, R/o Near Shiv Mandir, Sakatpura, Kota. 10. Shashi Shankar Sinha S/o Late Shri Rajkumar Prasad, R/o A-1105, Sreenatha Apartment, Khedli Phatak, Station Road, Kota. 11. Mahendra Kumar Sinolia S/o Sh. Madan Lal, R/o 28/35, Krishna Nagar, Kota. 12. Sanjiv Shankar Jha S/o Late Shri P.s. Jha, R/o C-50, Talawandi, Kota. 13. Arun Koolwal S/o Sh. Sitaram Koolwal, R/o F-181, Shyam Nagar, Jaipur. 14. Poonam Banani D/o Shri Leeladhar, R/o 511, Pukhrajpura, Bajrang Nagar, Kota. 15. Mohammad Shahid S/o Shri Mohammad Saddik, R/o Sumerganj Mandi, Distt. Bundi. 16. Hariom Meena S/o Shri Kanhaiya Lal Meena, R/o Ward [2026:RJ-JP:2984] (2 of 3) [WRES-587/2025] No. 03, Sanjay Nagar, Sultanpur, Tehsil Digod, Distt. Kota. 17. Aniketpuri S/o Shri Ashokpuri, R/o House No. 03, Gopal Vihar, Police Lines, Baran Road, Kota. 18. Nimish Kumar Nagar S/o Shri Nandkishore Nagar, R/o 452, Basant Vihar, Kota 19. Mahavir Kumar Jain S/o Shri Mangi Lal Jain, Shubham Sadan, In Front Of New Grain Mandi, Mahaveer Nagar, Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) 20. Nand Lal Son Of Shri Hari Singh, R/o Arya Nagar, Alwar ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Bank Of India, Through Chief General Manager, Local Head Office, Tilak Marg, Jaipur-302005. 2. Chairman, State Bank Of India, Sbi Corporate Office, State Bank Bhawan, 16Th Floor, Madam Cama Road, Mumbai-400021. 3. State Bank Of India, Through Circle Development Officer (Dgmhr) Local Head Office, Tilak Marg, Jaipur. 4. State Bank Of India, Through Assistant General Manager (Hr) Local Head Office, Tilak Marg, Jaipur-302005. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Suresh Kashyap For Respondent(s) : Mr. Yash Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 22/01/2026 1. Considered submissions of learned counsel for the parties. 2. S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6126/2022 is filed on behalf of twenty petitioners and during pendency of the writ petition, application No.1/2024 was filed on behalf of twelve petitioners for seeking leave to withdraw the writ petition qua them. A Co- ordinate Bench while considering the prayer, allowed the [2026:RJ-JP:2984] (3 of 3) [WRES-587/2025] application No.1/2024, thus, the writ petition remained pending qua eight petitioners. 3. While passing the order, a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court has further directed to the petitioners to file amended cause title within a week and non-filing will result in dismissal of the writ petition without reference to the Court. 4. Pursuant to order passed by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, Registrar (Judicial) has dismissed the writ petition on 03.07.2025 as the remaining petitioners failed to take steps by filing amended cause-title within one week. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has already filed amended cause title but same is filed after one week. 6. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents objects the grounds. 7. Considering submissions of learned counsel for the petitioners and considering the delay in filing the cause title, it is appropriate to give one more chance to the petitioners to pursue the remedy before this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 8. Hence, the restoration application is allowed and the writ petition is restored to Board. 9. Office is directed to re-register S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6126/2022 after taking amended cause title on record. 10. List before appropriate roster after two weeks. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/31