APHC010114072019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 5096/2019 Between: 1. SANAPALA RAMALAKSHMI, W/O. SRI SREENIVASA RAO, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/0. 39-19-111, MADHAVADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, THROUGH SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. THE S H O, AIRPORT POLICE STATION, V TOWN, VISAKHAPATNAM 4. KARRI VEERA VENKATA SATYANARAYANA REDDY, S/O. SRI VENKATA REDDY, AGED 56 YEARS, OCC DEPUTY MANAGER, ANDHRA BANK, ZONAL OFFICE, KAKINADA, R/O. RAJENDRA NAGAR, KANINADA - 3 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ or order/s more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondent no. 3 in interfering in Civil matters and in summoning the petitioner to the police station and making the petitioner to sit in police station, as being illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 21 and 300A of constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent no. 3 not to summon the petitioner to the police station and not to interfere in Civil matters and be pleased to pass 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct to the Respondent no. 3 not to summon the petitioner to the police and not to interfere in Civil Matters, pending disposal of the Writ petition and be pleased to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V VENKATA MAYUR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.5096 of 2019 ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri A. Veera Reddy, learned counsel representing Sri A. Venkata Mayur, learned counsel for the writ petitioner, submitted that, at this length of time, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication and that the writ petition has become infructuous. 2. Sri R. Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, representing respondent Nos.1 to 3, is in attendance. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 2nd March, 2026 cbn 4 124 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No: 5096 of 2019 2nd March, 2026 cbn