PURAN SINGH BISHT v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR.
W.P.(C)/13531/2026 · 2026-09-16
Amit Bansal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18496 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18496 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P.(C) 13531/2026 $~50 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010439122026 + W.P.(C) 13531/2026, CM APPL. 63105/2026 & CM APPL. 63106/2026 PURAN SINGH BISHT .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Parag P. Tripathi and Mr. Srinivasan Ramaswamy, Advocates. versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Chirag Madan, Mr. Sai Krishna Kumar, Ms. Rachael Tuli and Mr. Mayank Yadav, Advocates for MCD. Mr. Shashi Pratap Singh, Ms. Shagun Sabharwal and Ms. Laqshiya Saluja and Ms. Anamika Tyagi, Advocates for R-2. Mr. Niraj Kumar and Mr. Chaitanya Kumar, Advocates for Delhi Police.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL O R D E R % 16.09.2026 CM APPL. 63106/2026 (exemption)
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
W.P.(C) 13531/2026
2. The present writ petition has been filed seeking quashing of the show cause notice dated 17th July, 2026 issued by the respondent/MCD under Section 343 and 344 of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 and all This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/09/2026 at 11:38:32
W.P.(C) 13531/2026 proceedings consequent thereto.
3. The grievance of the petitioner is that the show cause notice alleged unauthorised construction in the shape of “deviation/extension beyond the standard plan/layout plan”. However, the petitioner has not been given a copy of the Standard Plan/Layout Plan. Hence, the petitioner is unable to know the extent of deviation/extension.
4. Mr. Parag P. Tripathi, senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, submits that the building of the petitioner is on old construction and there is no ongoing construction therein. He further submits that the petitioner has also filed an application for regularisation with the MCD on 1st September, 2026, which is yet to be decided by the respondent/MCD.
5. Having heard the counsel for the parties, the present petition is
disposed of with the following directions:- i. The respondent/MCD shall supply a copy of the standard plan/layout plan of the DDA to the petitioner within one (1) week from today. ii. Thereupon, the respondent/MCD shall decide the regularisation application filed on behalf of the petitioner. iii. Based on the outcome of the regularisation application, if need be, a hearing shall be given to the petitioner before passing any
order on the show cause notice.
6. Pending application stands disposed of.
AMIT BANSAL, J SEPTEMBER 16, 2026 Vivek/- This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/09/2026 at 11:38:32