Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SUB A(MD) NO. 29 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27-03-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR SUB A(MD) NO. 29 of 2026 IN CONT P(MD) SR NO. 3102 OF 2026
1. Zahirudeen S/o. N.M.Pasha 117/43 Town Hall Road Madurai 625 001. Appellant(s) Vs
1. Anwar Shameem Advocate Commissioner Chamber No.37 Law Chamber High Court Building Madurai.
2. Mohammed Imran Advocate Commissioner Chamber No.48 Law Chamber High Court Building Madurai. Respondent(s) For Appellant(s): Mr.A.Saravanan Prayer: This petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to Grant Leave to the petitioner to file the present Cont.P(MD) SR No.3102 of 2026 against the Contemnors for their willful and deliberate disobedience of the judgment passed by this Court made in https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WA(MD). No.1216/2025 dated 02.06.2025 and thus render justice. ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble G.R.Swaminathan J.) The petitioner hearin filed W.P.(MD)No.22825 of 2025 for directing the court appointed commissioners to conduct re-election for the petition mentioned Pallivasal. The writ petition was disposed of by us on 14.12.2025 in the following terms:-
“4. In this background, the present writ petition has been filed to direct the Court Commissioner to conduct re-election. Re-election can be ordered only if the election originally held is nullified. In this writ petition, the election already held has not been impugned at all. Granting liberty to the petitioner to avail such remedy available in law, this writ petition stands disposed of.” 2.When we granted liberty, we expected the petitioner to file a civil suit or an election OP before the appropriate Court or Wakf Tribunal. We did not intend to grant leave to the petitioner to file a contempt petition against the court appointed commissioners. The petitioner would allege that the voters list was not drawn properly and that dead persons were also included and that the petitioner who was included originally in the list was later erroneously removed. These contentions can as well be urged in the election OP. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
3. Granting such liberty, the sub application is dismissed. The contempt petition is closed at the SR stage.
(G.R.SWAMINATHAN J.) (K.RAJASEKAR J.) 27-03-2026 rmi To
1. Anwar Shameem Advocate Commissioner Chamber No.37 Law Chamber High Court Building Madurai.
2. Mohammed Imran Advocate Commissioner Chamber No.48 Law Chamber High Court Building Madurai. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis