Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:13755
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3367 of 2020 1 - Gram Panchayat, Korra Through The Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Korra, Tahsil- Kurud, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through the Secretary, Revenue And Disaster Management Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 2 - The Board Of Revenue Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur, Distirct- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Commissioner, Raipur Division, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - The Collector Dhamtari, District- Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh 5 - The Sub- Divisional Officer (Revenue) Kurud, District- Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh SHYNA AJAY Digitally signed by SHYNA AJAY DN: cn=SHYNA AJAY, o=PERSONAL, st=Chhattisgarh, c=IN
2 6 - The Superintendent Of Land Records, Dhamtari, Distrrict- Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh 7 - The Additional Tahsildar Bhakhara, District- Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh, 8 - Chandrahas Kamde S/o, Late Shri Jhaduram R/o Village- Korra, Tahsil- Kurud, District- Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh 9 - Shivcharan Das Mahant, Sarwarakar- Balaji Mandir, Manager- Collector, R/o Village- Korra, Tahsil-Kurud, District- Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s) (Cause Title downloaded from CIS Periphery) For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent/State For Respondent No.8 : Mr. Siddharth Sharma, Panel Lawyer Mr. RS Patel, Advocate
S B: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad
Order on Board
23/03/2026
1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs in the petition : 10.1 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, thereby
3 setting-aside/quashing the impugned order dated 09.09.2020 (Annexure P/1). 10.2 That any other relief/order which may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case including award of the cost of the petition may be given.
2. Mr. Vikas Dubey, Advocate appears and submits that this petition was originally filed by Gram Panchayat Korra through its then office bearers. However, after formation of a new Gram Panchayat, no instructions have been received from the newly formed body to continue this petition. Hence, learned counsel for the petitioner pleads no instructions in the matter.
3. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. However, if the concerned Gram Panchayat desires to pursue the matter, it would be at liberty to file a fresh petition. Sd/-
(Amitendra Kishore Prasad)
Judge Shyna Ajay