- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25341 WP No. 3454 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3454 OF 2022 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. A.P. NARAYANA RAJU S/O LATE V. PUTTARAJU AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/AT NO.MIC 937, LAKSHMI VENKATADRI, 1ST MAIN 1ST CROSS, WARD NO. 45 SHARADADEVINAGARA MYSURU - 570 003. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAJASHEKHAR K, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE CHAIRMAN/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF PARENTS AND SENIOR CITIZENS TRIBUNAL BENGLURU NORTH TALUK, SUB DIVISION BENGALURU - 560 002. 2. SMT. RADHAMMA W/O LATE V. PUTTARAJU AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. V-3 3RD FLOOR, 3RD CROSS KASTURIBAINAGARA, P.G. HALLI Digitally signed by SUMA B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25341 WP No. 3454 of 2022 MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU - 560 003. 3. SMT.P. RAJALAKSHMI D/O LATE P.V. PUTTARAJU W/O B.K. RAJIVA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. V-3, 3RD FLOOR, 3RD CROSS, KASTURIBAINAGARA, P.G. HALLI MALLESHWARAM,BENGALURU - 560 003. 4. SMT. A.P. ANITHA D/O LATE V. PUTTARAJU W/O RAMESH RAJU AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS R/AT NO.15, 12TH CROSS S.P. EXTENSION, P.G. HALLI MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU - 560 003. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. LALITHA P.M, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. S.P. SATHISH, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 30.11.2021, PASSED BY THE R1 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25341 WP No. 3454 of 2022 2. The memo reads as under: "The advocate for petitioner submits as follows- That I have been instructed by the petitioner to withdraw the above case. Hence, the above petition may be dismissed as withdrawn, reserving liberty to file once again if need arises in the interest of justice and equity;" 3. In view of memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 4. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE SSD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2