APHC010114592008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3524] WEDNESDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 251/2008 Between: 1. JAYALAKSHMI, W/O. SURESH CHANDRA PRASAD, R/O. LAKSHMI NIVAS, NAIDU BUILDINGS, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT AND 1. L SURESH CHANDRA PRASAD, S/o. Sreeramulu, R/o. Venkatapuram, G.D.Nellore Mandal, Chittoor District. ...RESPONDENT Appeal Under Section_____against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2008(CMAMP 589 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 145 days in resubmitting the CMASR.No. 45303/2007 in the interest of justice IA NO: 2 OF 2008(CMAMP 613 OF 2008 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the Decree and Order dated 29.08.2007 passed in HMOP.No. 1/2003 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge's Court, Chittoor Counsel for the Appellant: 1. K RAMAMOHAN Counsel for the Respondent: 1. T C KRISHNAN The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 251/2008 JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) On 19.01.2026, the following order was passed: <On 17.02.2025, the following order was passed: <Ms.Mahalakshmi, learned counsel appears for the appellant. 2. The appellant is the wife filed this appeal challenging the decree of divorce granted on the petition of respondent-husband. 3. There is interim order on the divorce decree. 4. No representation for the respondent even in the revised call. 5. Post after two (02) weeks in the weekly list. 6. If the respondent is not present on the next date of listing, this Court will proceed exparte against the respondent.= 2. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that respondent-husband married prior to the grant of interim order in the appeal. 3. Learned counsel for the appellant prays for time as last opportunity to obtain instructions on the aforesaid point as also if the appellant is interested in prosecuting the appeal or not. 4. Post on 02.02.2026.= 2. Today, there is no representation for the appellant. 3. Sri T.C.Krishnan, learned counsel appears for the respondent. 4. The matter pertains to the year 2008 and is listed under the caption >old matters?. The cause-list mentions that the old matters may not be adjourned. 5. In view of the above, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for >want of prosecution?. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J _____________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM,J Dated: 04.02.2026 AG 141 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 251/2008 Dated: 04.02.2026 AG