APHC010117152026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1789/2026 Between: 1.PERUMALLA PHANINDRA KUMAR, S/O. VENKATA VIJAYA RAGHAVA RAO, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, VYSYA, R/O. D.NO.9-76, NEAR RAMALAYAM TEMPLE, NETHALAVARI VEEDHI, VELAMAPETA, GANAPAVARAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL (ACCUSED NO.1) 2.PERUMALLA BUSHA LATHA,, W/O. PHANINDRA KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, VYSYA, R/O. D.NO.9-76, NEAR RAMALAYAM TEMPLE, NETHALAVARI VEEDHI, VELAMAPETA, GANAPAVARAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL. (ACCUSED NO.2) 3.GANDHI ANIL KUMAR,, S/O. VENKATA RAMA KRISHNA RAO, 42 YEARS, VYSYA, MAIN ROAD, GANAPAVARAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL (ACCUSED NO.5) ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Through its Public Prosecutor High Court of Andhra Pradesh, High Court Building, Amaravathi. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1.NALABOLU VENKATA PAVANKUMAR Counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioners and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor. 2. In the morning session, upon hearing the submissions of learned Counsel for the Petitioners, this Court directed the Petitioners to implead the victim in the present matter. The presence of the Petitioners before the learned Trial Court was dispensed with, except when the learned Trial Court may otherwise deem it necessary. The matter was accordingly directed to be listed after eight weeks for further consideration. 3. In the evening session, however, learned Counsel for the Petitioners sought permission of this Court to withdraw the criminal petition, with liberty to file a fresh Criminal Petition and also a formal communication was tendered to the Registrar (Judicial) and was placed before this Court, wherein learned Counsel for the Petitioners sought permission to withdraw the Criminal Petition. 4. Upon due consideration, permission was accorded by this Court. 5. Consequently, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the Petitioners to file a fresh criminal petition, if so advised. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 05.03.2026 VTS