Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18481 (JHR)

PEER MOHAMMAD ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5995/2026 · 2026-07-01

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:19188 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5995 of 2026 ------ Peer Mohammad Ansari, aged about 50 years, s/o late Kasim Ansari, At-Chaura, P.O. & P.S.-Pandu, Dist.-Palamau, Jharkhand … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Vishwajeet Kr. Tiwari, Advocate : Mr. Sheo Kr. Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Nawin Kr. Singh, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 01.07.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Untari Road P.S. Case No. 06 of 2026, registered for the offences punishable under sections 115(2), 126(2), 117(2), 118(2), 109, 351(2), 352, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner, is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, attempted to commit murder of the informant, namely, Mazid Alam. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner had no intention to kill. It is next submitted that there was a free fight between the parties and from the side of the petitioner, Untari Road P.S. Case No. 07 of 2026 has been instituted against the informant party. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 03.05.2026, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 19 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the co-accused person with similar allegation has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 23.06.2026 in B.A. No.5627 of 2026. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.F.C., Palamau at Daltonganj, in connection with Untari Road P.S. Case No. 06 of 2026, with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 01.07.2026 Gunjan-