Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1848 (ALL)

QAADIR AND 8 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P.

NA529/2247/2026 · 2026-05-04

Prashant Mishra I

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 2247 of 2026 Court No. - 84 HON'BLE PRASHANT MISHRA-I, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant application has been preferred by the applicant with a prayer to expedite the proceeding of Sessions Case no. 2297 of 2024 (State Vs. Qaadir and Others) arising out of Case Crime No. 487 of 2016 under Sections 147, 148, 323, 325, 506 I.P.C. Police Station- Malpura, District- Agra pending in the Court of learned Court of A.C.J.M. Court No. 2, Agra. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that present case is pending since long and the case has not culminated to its logical conclusion. 4. Learned A.G.A. has no objection if the matter be expedited in the interest of justice. 5. Keeping in view the period of pendency of the case, it is directed that the learned trial court shall make all endeavour to decide this case expeditiously preferably within a period of one year from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal hurdle, without permitting undue adjournments to either sides. 6. With the aforesaid, this application is disposed of. May 5, 2026 Saurabh Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ajay Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Prashant Mishra-I,J.) Qaadir And 8 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad