Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18475 (MAD)

Jansi Rani v. The Branch Manager

WP(MD)/19013/2025 · 2026-03-26

Hemant Chandangoudar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :26.03.2026 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR W.P(MD)No.19013 of 2025 Jansi Rani ... Petitioner .Vs. 1.The Branch Manager, Canara Bank, Sivakasi Branch, Virudhunagar District. 2.The Tahsildar, Sivakasi Taluk , Virudhunagar District. ... Respondents (R2 is suo motu imleaded as per order of this Court made in W.P(MD)No.19013 of 2025, dated 14.7.2025) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the entire records pertaining to the impugned communication of the respondent in Ref.No. 0921842044588DEATHCLAIM, dated 19.6.2025 and quash the same as illegal and direct the respondent to return back the Petitioner's jewels kept in Loan No.0921101036066 in the event of further foreclosure,dated 13.7.2021. 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis For Petitioner : M/s.D.S.Haroon Rasheed For Respondent-1 : Mr.C.Karthik Standing Counsel For Respondent-2 : Mr.S.Kameswaran Government Advocate O R D E R The petitioner challenges the communication dated 19.06.2025 issued by the first respondent-Bank. 2. By the said communication, the petitioner has been called upon to submit a Non-Traceable Certificate in respect of her mother- in-law for the purpose of releasing the gold jewellery pledged by her deceased husband. 3. The petitioner’s husband had availed a loan by pledging gold jewellery. After his demise, the petitioner has repaid the entire loan amount. However, the first respondent-Bank has refused to release the pledged gold jewellery, insisting on production of a Non- 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Traceable Certificate in respect of the petitioner’s mother-in-law. The petitioner states that her mother-in-law is not traceable and, therefore, no objection cannot be obtained from her. It is also stated that the mother-in-law has not made any claim with the Bank in respect of the pledged gold jewellery. 4. In the above circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of with the following directions: (i) The petitioner shall cause a public notice to be published, in the name of the first respondent-Bank, in a daily newspaper having wide circulation in the locality, inviting objections, if any, in respect of the release of the pledged gold jewellery; (ii) Upon such publication, if no objection is received from the petitioner’s mother-in-law within seven days from the date of publication , the first respondent-Bank shall release the gold jewellery pledged by the petitioner’s deceased husband to the petitioner; (iii) The release shall be subject to the petitioner furnishing an 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis indemnity bond to the satisfaction of the first respondent-Bank. 5. 5. The above exercise shall be completed within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 26.03.2026 NCS : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No vsn To 1.The Branch Manager, Canara Bank, Sivakasi Branch, Virudhunagar District. 2.The Tahsildar, Sivakasi Taluk , Virudhunagar District. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR.,J. vsn ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)No.19013 of 2025 26.03.2026 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis