Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 18471 (KAR)

SRI. B. PRAKASH, v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/19868/2025 · 2026-06-02

Ashok S Kinagi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25666 WP No. 19868 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 19868 OF 2025 (S-TR) BETWEEN: SRI. B. PRAKASH S/O. ASHWATHANARAYANA RAO M. K., AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, UNDER AN ORDER OF POSTING AS ASSISTANT MANAGER, KARNATAKA FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LIMITED, MANGALORE, DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT - 575 001, PERMANENTLY RESIDING AT NO. 30, ESCORTS ENGINEERS LAYOUT, YELAHANKA 5TH PHASE, BANGALORE 560 064 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SATISH K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FOOD, CIVIL SUPPLIES AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS AND LEGAL METROLOGY, VIKASA SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560 001 2. KARNATAKA FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, NO. 16/1, MILLERS TANK BED AREA, Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:25666 WP No. 19868 of 2025 BANGALORE 560 052 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G. RAMESH NAIK, AGA FOR R1 SRI. G B NANDISH GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 SMT. KUSUMA M., ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS PERTAINING TO IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 30.06.2025 BEARING NO. E-AAANAASA 130 EFT 2025 (1824171) ISSUED BY THE R1 (ANNEXURE -F). QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER OF TRANSFER DATED 30.06.2025 BEARING NO. E-AAANAASA 130 EFT 2025 (1824171) ISSUED BY THE R1 (ANNEXURE -F). THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL ORDER 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to passage of time, the writ petition has rendered infructuous. 2. Submission is placed on record. 3. The writ petition is disposed of as having rendered infructuous. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE RK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34