Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1847 (RAJ)

KISHAN MALIYA S/O JAGDISH MALIYA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/2161/2026 · 2026-03-27

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:12911] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2161/2026 Kishan Maliya S/o Jagdish Maliya, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Khatodh Wali Gali, Purane Sadar Thane Ke Peechhe, Presently Residing As Tenant In The House Of Kailash Joshi, Paras Colony Masuda Road, Beawar, Police Station Beawar City District Beawar. (At Present In Judicial Custody At District Jail Beawar) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Bismad Kaur and Mr. Yogesh Kumar Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, AGA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 27/03/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.109/2025 registered at Police Station Beawar Sadar, District Beawar for offences under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the prime allegations for committing the forgery against the co- accused-Hemant Nath and Salman. The co-accused-Salman Cheeta @ Mukesh has been enlarged on bail by the trial Court on 18.03.2026. Petitioner is behind the bars since 05.12.2025 [2026:RJ-JP:12911] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2161/2026] without any criminal past. The trial of the case will take considerable time and no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Kishan Maliya S/o Jagdish Maliya, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/43