Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1847 (GAU)

RAMESH ALIAS ROMESH BASUMATARY v. STATE OF ASSAM

Bail Appln./256/2026 · 2026-02-17

Rajesh Mazumdar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010015372026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./256/2026 RAMESH ALIAS ROMESH BASUMATARY S/O SRI NOREN BASUMATARY, R/O MILANPUR, PS GOHPUR, DIST BISWANATH, ASSAM VERSUS STATE OF ASSAM TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE LEARNED PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A W AMAN, MD A RAHMAN,MS SURAYA RAHMAN,SAMIM RAHMAN,MR SARFRAZ NAWAZ,MR. SURAJIT DAS Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER 18.02.2026 Heard Mr. Sarfraz Nawaz, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Mr. B. Sharma, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam representing State. By this application filed under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 the petitioner, namely, Ramesh @ Romesh Basumatary, who is in custody in connection with Sonari P.S. Case No. 116/2025, has prayed Page No.# 2/2 for release on bail. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has produced the Case Diary. I have gone through the materials available on record and it appears that the investigation is still going on. Having heard the learned counsel for both sides and considering entire aspect of the matter, this court is of the view that the petitioner does not deserve to be released on bail, at this stage. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. The bail application is disposed of. Case Diary shall be returned. JUDGE Comparing Assistant