[2026:RJ-JP:4715] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 1676/2025 IN S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1424/2020 Suman Meena @ Motishankar S/o Shri Durgalal, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Meeno Ka Barda (Cheta) Police Station Hindoli, District Bundi (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail Tonk) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Govind Prasad Rawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 02/02/2026 vihykFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls /kkjk 430 Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk ds varxZr] fof'k"V U;k;ky;] ySafxd vijk/kksa ls ckydksa dk laj{k.k vf/kfu;e 2012 rFkk ckyd vf/kdkj laj{k.k vk;ksx vf/kfu;e] 2005] la[;k 2 vtesj] ¼jktLFkku½ }kjk ls'ku izdj.k la[;k&68@2019 ¼lh-vkbZ-,l- ua- 68@2019½ ljdkj cuke lqeu eh.kk esa ikfjr fu.kZ; o naMkns'k fnukad 20- 08-2020 ds fo:) ;g f}rh; ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= izLrqr fd;k x;k gS] ftlds }kjk vfHk;qDr dks vkjksfir vijk/kksa esa nks"kfl) fd;k tkdj vFkZn.M lfgr vf/kdre chl o"kZ ds dBksj dkjkokl ls nf.Mr fd;k x;k gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk rdZ gS fd izdj.k esa vihykFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vfHkj{kk dh vof/k fnukad 02-09-2025 rd 7 o"kZ 4 ekg gks pqdh gSA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd izdj.k esa vihy dh fu;fer [2026:RJ-JP:4715] (2 of 4) [SOSA-1676/2025] lquokbZ esa ,d yack le; yxus dh laHkkouk gSA vihykFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds vf/koDrk }kjk ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr U;kf;d n`"Vkarksa dk voyac fy;k gSA 1. Rajaram Alias Raju Vs. The State of Raj., CRLA@SLP (CRL.) No. 8908/2025, Dated 17-09-2025. 2. Zameer Vs. The State of Karnataka, Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 5636/2024 Dated 22-11-2024. 3. Rohit Singh Vs. The State of U.P., Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 2883/2024 Dated 02-08-2024. 4. Sajid Vs. The State of Raj., Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 12714/2025 Dated 11-11-2025. 5. Govind @ Achal Vijay Vs. The State of Raj., Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 15839/2024. iwoZ esa vihykFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk izFke ltk LFkxu dk izkFkZuk i= tfj, izR;kgj.k fuLrkfjr fd;k x;k Fkk vkSj rnqijkar naMkns'k dh vof/k mijksDrkuqlkj gksus ls vihykFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dk ;g f}rh; ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tk,A fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd }kjk ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= dk fojks/k fd;k x;k gSA mudk rdZ gS fd izdj.k esa vihykFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds }kjk yxHkx 13 o"khZ; ckfydk ds lkFk cykRdkj djus ds xaHkhj vkjksi gSa vkSj bl lanHkZ esa vk{ksfir fu.kZ; fnukad 20-08-2020 }kjk lacaf/kr U;k;ky; us iSjk uacj 22 esa vk, lk{; ds vk/kkj ij vfHk;ksD=h dh tUefrfFk 17-06-2006 ekurs gq, fu/kkZfjr dh gS ftlls ihfMrk dh vk;q ?kVuk ds le; yxHkx 13 o"kZ gksuk ik;k x;k gSA mudk ;g Hkh rdZ gS fd izdj.k esa vfHk;ksD=h ihMCY;w&2 ds :i esa ijhf{kr gqbZ gS vkSj vfHk;ksD=h ds lkFk ;kSu fgalk dkfjr gksus dh iqf"V fpfdRldh; lk{kh ihMCY;w&7 lhek ujofj;k ds lk{; ls gqbZ gSA ftlls vfHk;ksD=h dk gkbZeu VksuZ gksuk ik;k x;k gSA blds vfrfjDr ,Q,l,y fjiksVZ izn'kZ ih& 32 ds vuqlkj vfHk;ksD=h ds var%oL=ksa esa rFkk vfHk;qDr ds var%oL=ksa esa] blds vfrfjDr vfHk;ksD=h ds otkbuy Loso rFkk ctkbuy [2026:RJ-JP:4715] (3 of 4) [SOSA-1676/2025] fyfLe;k esa ekuo oh;Z dh mifLFkfr o vihykFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds var%oL= esa Hkh ekuo oh;Z dh mifLFkfr ikbZ xbZ gSA Mh,u, fjiksVZ izn'kZ ih&33 ds vuqlkj Hkh vfHk;ksD=h ds vr%oL=ksa esa tks Mh,u,l izksQkbZy ik;k x;k gS og vihykFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds jDr ls feyku djrk gqvk gSA vr% bl izdkj vihykFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo#) xaHkhj vkjksi gSa vkSj ek= vihykFkhZ@vfHk;qDr }kjk naMkns'k dh vof/k esa vfHkj{kk esa jgus ds vk/kkj ij vihykFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds fo#) ikfjr mDr naMkns'k ds vkns'k dks fuyafcr fd, tkus dk dksbZ dkj.k ugha gSA vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa mDr ;kfpdk vLohdkj dh tk,A cgl lquh xbZA i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA माननीय सብኘ्ሴ ्቗ायालय ने जमनाs लाल बनाम रा्ቋ राज्ቝान, 2025 INSC 935 — के ्ቚकरण में निन्ቖानुसार अብኘलोकन निकया है "17. In Vijay Kumar v. Narendra and Others, (2002) 9 SCC 36 this Court observed as follows: “10. On perusal of the record and on consideration of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, we are of the view that in the context of the facts and circumstances of the case the High Court was in error in passing the order releasing the respondents on bail. The High Court has neither given any reason nor has indicated any exceptional circumstance for granting bail to the respondents. In the above circumstances, it is difficult for us to even surmise the circumstance which prompted the learned Single Judge to consider the accused persons to be entitled to the discretionary relief of bail pending the appeal. The principle is well settled that in considering the prayer for bail in a case involving a serious offence like murder punishable under Section 302 IPC, the court should consider the relevant factors like the nature of the accusation made against the accused, the manner in which the crime is alleged to have been committed, the gravity of the offence, and the desirability of releasing [2026:RJ-JP:4715] (4 of 4) [SOSA-1676/2025] the accused on bail after they have been convicted for committing the serious offence of murder. Our attention has not been drawn to any material which would show that the learned Single Judge took into consideration the relevant factors while passing the bail order. We refrain ourselves from making any observation touching on merits of the case lest it may prejudice any of the parties. Suffice it to state that we do not consider this a fit case for grant of bail to the respondents during pendency of the appeal filed by them.” Though said in the context of Section 302 IPC, it applies with equal force to a case of the present nature under the POCSO Act, also." vihykFkhZ@vfHk;qDr }kjk 13 o"khZ; vcks/k ckfydk ds lkFk cykRdkj djus ds rF; vfHkys[k ij gSa vkSj bl lanHkZ esa lacaf/kr U;k;ky; }kjk vius fu.kZ; esa vfHk;ksD=h dh lk{; ds vfrfjDr fpfdRldh; ,oa jklk;fud tkap fjiksVZ ,oa Mh,u, fjiksVZ dk voyac ysrs gq, vihykFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dks nks"kfl) fd;k x;k gSA bl izdze ij izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.kksa ij xgurk ls fopkj djus dh vko';drk ugha gSA izFken`"V;k vfHkys[k ij mijksDr izys[kh; lk{; mifLFkr gSa ftlls vihykFkhZ@vfHk;qDr }kjk vijk/k dkfjr fd, tkus ds rF; vfHkys[k ij fd, gSaA vihykFkhZ@vfHk;qDr dh vfHkj{kk dh vof/k vius vkiesa bl izdkj ds xaHkhj vijk/kksa esa vihykFkhZ@vfHk;qDr ds naMkns'k dks fuyafcr djrs gq, NksM+s tkus dk vk/kkj ugha gks ldrh gSA vr% mijksDr f}rh; ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= vLohdkj fd;k tkrk gSA vihykFkhZ@vfHk;qDr vihy dh 'kh?kz lquokbZ gsrq lacaf/kr U;k;ky; ds le{k vkosnu izLrqr djus gsrq Lora= gSaA (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J RAMESHWAR /31