Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body
2026 DAILYLAW 18465 (PNJ)
MAN SINGH v. STATE OF HARYANA
CRM-M/18068/2026 · 2026-05-14
Rupinderjit Chahal
body2026
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18465 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 18465 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-18068-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr.No.226 CRM-M-18068-2026 Decided on : 14.05.2026 Man Singh
...... Petitioner
Versus State of Haryana ...... Respondent CORAM :
*** Present : Mr. Dushyant Saharan, Advocate for the petitioner.
.
*** , J (ORAL) ! " # # $%$ & '()" $ %*$$%$+ $,-. " / & 0 + 1 $ ! %*$$%$+ &( 23# 1 1 1 & 3 4 1 1 5$ 6 ( '()1 4 MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.05.15 12:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh CRM-M-18068-2026 2 7 & 3 1 1 3 '() 1 ( & 1 3 & 3 3 & 4 3 3 1 8 1 3 4 3 & 9 & 3 4 & 3 9
%$$%$+ 9 &3 1 # 3 1 & & # & &9 & 1 7 1 1 # 3 & & &3 33 & &3 & 3 4 33 8 However, she has not controverted the fact that the petitioner is the first time offender as he is not involved in any other case.
+ 8 1 & - 1 3 3 3 & MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.05.15 12:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh CRM-M-18068-2026 3 1 & 1 1 1 5 3 3 & 3 1 & : 3 & ;& 3 - ! 1 < !"# $ % & ' # ( $ $ % % % $ & ' # ( ) !"# % *+ !"# $ % $ !"#, + ;& 3 - : 3 " #$ %&'( ) *" + + ( !, ! : 3 =& 3 - 9 , . - 9 ;& 3 - 1 1 &
" 0 +> : 3 ) "% $ %# + ' - .- ./0012+ /3 2! < $$ %% " &. !
MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.05.15 12:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh CRM-M-18068-2026 4 " # (.- $$ !"# / $ $ 0 / , $$ 123 +4! " ! % 5 $ % 5 % $ % $ $$ %% !" # 2 $/ % ( $ $( 0 % $, %% $$ #$$ $ 0 9 & & 3 4 3 & 1 & 9 3 3 & 4 1 & &: 3 3 & & %
3 %+3 %+> > 3 # 3 1 & & 1 & 1 & $ - ( MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.05.15 12:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh CRM-M-18068-2026 5 ) : 3 =& 3 - 4 5 6 7 /8-. - ./2/1 =& 6- # 3 && & 3 3 & $ - ( 6$ $7 60$ 8 7 $ ( 1 & 1 & &
& & ? & - ? ?-@ ( & 6 3 33 Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No A & <B ?" MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.05.15 12:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh