$~73 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010380602026 + W.P.(C) 11849/2026 & CM APPL. 54723/2026, CM APPL. 54724/2026, CM APPL. 54725/2026 MD ARAM .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Md Azam Ansari, Ms. Azeema & Afjal Ansari, Advs. versus THE CHAIRPERSON, NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF OPEN SCHOOLING & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. S. Rajappa, Mr. R. Gowrishankar and Ms. G. Dhivyasri, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH O R D E R % 14.09.2026 1. Since there was a holiday on 11.09.2026, the matter was taken up today for hearing. 2. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayers :- “a) Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ / order / direction directing the respondents to forthwith release the petitioner's result of all nine papers given for improvement on 17 June 2026, 20 June 2026, 23 June 2026, 08 July 2026, 15 July 2026, 22 July 2026, 25 July 2026, 28 July 2026 and 05 Aug 2026 and issue a new revised mark sheet by updating This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/09/2026 at 11:45:02 improved marks in the already issued ‘Marks Statement-Cum-Certificate’ dated 25 March 2026 in case the numbers/percentage improved in any of the aforesaid 9 subjects in which petitioner appeared solely for the purpose of improvement as petitioner has already passed his Class-12 Examination in March 2026 itself. b) In the alternative, let respondents cancel the paper of 17 June 2026 in which there is allegation of unfair means although nothing has been officially intimated to petitioner as yet and no show cause notice or anything whatsoever has been issued to petitioner as yet despite there is a proforma in the form of Annexure P-10 to issue notice in such cases but no notice has been issued as yet and almost 2 months elapsed and declare the result of rest of the 8 papers which petitioner wrote for improving his percentage…” 3. Mr. Rajappa, learned counsel for the respondents, states that the result of the 9 papers as mentioned in the prayer has already been released. He also submits that the petitioner did not participate in the practical exams and hence, there is no result for the same. 4. Mr. Ansari, learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the petitioner had appeared for the practical exam and has shown the practical file. 5. Let the respondents consider the same, within one week and in case, the respondents are of the view that the practical exams have not been taken, the petitioner will be permitted to re-appear in the practical exams subject to the procedural formalities and expeditiously. 6. With these directions, the petition along with pending applications, if This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/09/2026 at 11:45:02 any, is disposed of. JASMEET SINGH, J SEPTEMBER 14, 2026/sp This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/09/2026 at 11:45:02